MedPath

Crisis Resource Management Improvement Through Intellectual Questioning of Authority

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Medical Education, Simulation, Crisis Resource Management
Interventions
Other: Standard ACLS Training
Other: Crisis Resource Management Skill Training
Registration Number
NCT03707964
Lead Sponsor
National University Hospital, Singapore
Brief Summary

This is a randomized controlled trial examining the effectiveness of a teaching intervention on residents' and medical students' ability to challenge clearly wrong decisions by a superior during a simulated life-threatening crisis. Participants will be randomly allocated into the control or intervention arm. The intervention arm will receive education on crisis resource management (CRM) and teaching targeting the cognitive skills required to monitor and challenge a superior's decision, and conflict resolution tools. Participants will then take part in a simulation scenario 2 to 4 weeks later and will be assessed based on 6 challenge points, followed by a debrief session.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
25
Inclusion Criteria
  • Medical officers or Internal medicine, surgical and emergency medicine residents who are in their 2nd post-graduate year of training, or
  • Phase V medical students from Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore
Exclusion Criteria
  • Refusal for informed consent, or
  • Refusal for video recording during simulation sessions

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
ControlStandard ACLS TrainingSubjects allocated to the control arm will receive standard didactic interactive session on Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) principles, as part of their regular teaching schedule.
InterventionCrisis Resource Management Skill TrainingSubjects allocated to the intervention arm will receive education on crisis resource management (CRM) and teaching targeting the cognitive skills required to monitor and challenge a superior's decision, and conflict resolution tools, in addition to standard didactic interactive session on Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) principles.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Effect of a teaching intervention on participants' ability to challenge clearly wrong decisions by a superior during a simulated life-threatening crisis20 minutes

Comparison of the best modified Advocacy-Inquiry Score (mAIS) responses of the 6 challenge opportunities between the intervention and control groups. The mAIS is a modification of the Advocacy-Inquiry method which includes five scoring levels with the addition of a sixth level when a trainee attempts to take over management of the case.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Influence of the confederate's gender on participant's ability to challenge incorrect decisions20 minutes

Comparison of the median modified Advocacy-Inquiry Score (mAIS) responses between the subjects exposed to male versus female confederate specialist. The mAIS is a modification of the Advocacy-Inquiry method which includes five scoring levels with the addition of a sixth level when a trainee attempts to take over management of the case.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

National University Hospital, Singapore

πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬

Singapore, Singapore

Β© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath