Crisis Resource Management Improvement Through Intellectual Questioning of Authority
- Conditions
- Medical Education, Simulation, Crisis Resource Management
- Interventions
- Other: Standard ACLS TrainingOther: Crisis Resource Management Skill Training
- Registration Number
- NCT03707964
- Lead Sponsor
- National University Hospital, Singapore
- Brief Summary
This is a randomized controlled trial examining the effectiveness of a teaching intervention on residents' and medical students' ability to challenge clearly wrong decisions by a superior during a simulated life-threatening crisis. Participants will be randomly allocated into the control or intervention arm. The intervention arm will receive education on crisis resource management (CRM) and teaching targeting the cognitive skills required to monitor and challenge a superior's decision, and conflict resolution tools. Participants will then take part in a simulation scenario 2 to 4 weeks later and will be assessed based on 6 challenge points, followed by a debrief session.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 25
- Medical officers or Internal medicine, surgical and emergency medicine residents who are in their 2nd post-graduate year of training, or
- Phase V medical students from Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore
- Refusal for informed consent, or
- Refusal for video recording during simulation sessions
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Control Standard ACLS Training Subjects allocated to the control arm will receive standard didactic interactive session on Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) principles, as part of their regular teaching schedule. Intervention Crisis Resource Management Skill Training Subjects allocated to the intervention arm will receive education on crisis resource management (CRM) and teaching targeting the cognitive skills required to monitor and challenge a superior's decision, and conflict resolution tools, in addition to standard didactic interactive session on Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) principles.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Effect of a teaching intervention on participants' ability to challenge clearly wrong decisions by a superior during a simulated life-threatening crisis 20 minutes Comparison of the best modified Advocacy-Inquiry Score (mAIS) responses of the 6 challenge opportunities between the intervention and control groups. The mAIS is a modification of the Advocacy-Inquiry method which includes five scoring levels with the addition of a sixth level when a trainee attempts to take over management of the case.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Influence of the confederate's gender on participant's ability to challenge incorrect decisions 20 minutes Comparison of the median modified Advocacy-Inquiry Score (mAIS) responses between the subjects exposed to male versus female confederate specialist. The mAIS is a modification of the Advocacy-Inquiry method which includes five scoring levels with the addition of a sixth level when a trainee attempts to take over management of the case.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
National University Hospital, Singapore
πΈπ¬Singapore, Singapore