MedPath

Use of Vibration Anesthesia Device in Intratympanic Injections

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Intratympanic Injections
Sudden Hearing Loss
Interventions
Device: Vibration Anesthesia Device (VAD)
Drug: local anesthetic cream
Other: saline drops
Registration Number
NCT06885723
Lead Sponsor
Yuzuncu Yıl University
Brief Summary

SUMMARY Intratympanic injections commonly cause pain in the patients. Intratympanic steroid injection (ITS) application can be performed by direct injection without anesthesia or with local anesthesia induced by lidocaine spray, lidocaine injection, topical phenol, pantocaine, EMLA cream (lidocaine+prilocaine) or vibration anesthesia device (VAD). The advantage of VAD application over other anesthetic agents was that it eliminated the need to use local anesthetics that may disrupt wound healing. In addition, inducing anesthesia with VAD can be considered as an alternative method in patients allergic to drugs.

Detailed Description

ABSTRACT In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of four methods including topical lidocaine spray, local anesthetic cream, vibration anesthesia device (VAD), and saline drops (control group) in the reduction of pain after intratympanic steroid injections (ITS's) and to demonstrate the effectiveness of VAD use. The prospective study included 40 patients aged 18-70 years with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. After each ITS, pain assessment was performed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Numerical Rating Scales (NRS), and Verbal Rating Scales (VRS).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  • Aged 18-70 years with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss
Exclusion Criteria
  • History of otologic surgery,
  • Recent ototoxic drug use,
  • Congenital inner ear malformation,
  • History of chemoradiotherapy due to malignant neoplasia,
  • Presence of acute or chronic otitis media,
  • Age under 18 years, over 70 years
  • History of local anesthesia allergy,
  • Coagulation abnormality,
  • Pregnant and lactating women,
  • Hearing cases with other neurootological diseases

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
1.groupVibration Anesthesia Device (VAD)Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient. After each ITS, pain assessment was performed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Numerical Rating Scales (NRS), and Verbal Rating Scales (VRS)
2.grouplocal anesthetic creamPrior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.
3.grouplidocaine sprayPrior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.
4.groupsaline dropsPrior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)56 weeks

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). the visual analog scale (VAS) scaled between 0-10,were used.

Eleven-Point Numeric Rating Scale(NRS-11)56 weeks

Eleven-Point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11). the numerical rating scale (NRS) scaled between 0-10 were used.

Four-Category Verbal Rating Scale(VRS-4)56 weeks

Four-Category Verbal Rating Scale (VRS-4). the verbal rating scale (VRS) scaled between 0-4 were used.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

van yuzuncu yil university, Bardakçı, Yüzüncü Yıl Ünv., 65080 Tuşba/Van

🇹🇷

VAN, Turkey

van yuzuncu yil university, Bardakçı, Yüzüncü Yıl Ünv., 65080 Tuşba/Van
🇹🇷VAN, Turkey

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.