MedPath

Intracervical Anesthesia and Pain Associated With Intrauterine Contraceptive Insertion

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Anesthesia, Local
Pain, Acute
IUD Insertion Complication
Interventions
Drug: Anesthesia
Procedure: Dry-needling
Registration Number
NCT03111342
Lead Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
Brief Summary

The primary aim of our study is to evaluate the effect of intracervical anesthesia on pain scores immediately following levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) insertion in nulligravida women.

Detailed Description

No prophylactic pharmacological intervention has proven efficacy in relieving pain during or after the insertion of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), only in reducing pain associated with the tenaculum. It is known that the nulligravida women have 3 times more chance of presenting moderate / severe pain associated to LNG-IUS placement. A previous study showed that injectable intracervical anesthesia reduced the risk of moderate/severe pain by 40%. However, the anesthetic dose was small (36 mg of lidocaine) and the study did not evaluate only nulligravida women which are potential candidates for most pain relief benefit. Thus, the primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of intracervical anesthesia on pain scores immediately following LNG-IUS insertion in nulligravida women.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
300
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age between 18 and 45 years;
  • That were never pregnant before;
  • That wants to use LNG-IUD;
  • Not pregnant at the time of insertion;
  • No haematological disease;
  • That do not have signs and / or symptoms of vaginal / cervical infection.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Categories 3 and / or 4 for the use of LNG-IUD according to the medical eligibility criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO), users of illicit drugs and / or alcohol, allergy or contraindication to lidocaine, presence of chronic pelvic pain of any etiology, presence of cervical abnormality such as isthmus-cervical fibrosis or incompetence, surgery on the cervix, psychiatric disorders, chronic use of medications that could interfere with the pain threshold (such as antidepressants and anticonvulsants).
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
AnesthesiaAnesthesiaA 2% lidocaine without vasoconstrictor injection into the cervix
Dry-needlingDry-needlingA placement of thin needle into the cervix without substance injection
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pain associated with LNG-IUS insertion using VASImmediately following LNG-IUS insertion

To evaluate pain scores using the visual analog scale (VAS)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pain associated with LNG-IUS insertion using face scaleImmediately following LNG-IUS insertion

To evaluate pain scores using faces scale of the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP)

Pain associated with tenaculum placement using faces scaleImmediately following tenaculum placement

To evaluate pain scores using faces scale of the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP)

Pain associated with tenaculum placement using VASImmediately following tenaculum placement

To evaluate pain scores using the visual analog scale (VAS)

Ease of IUS insertionImmediately following LNG-IUS insertion

To evaluate ease of LNG-IUS insertion rated by the provider

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Sao Paulo

🇧🇷

Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath