Real-world Observation of Medical Accuracy of a Novel AI-app
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 49
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Accuracy and comprehensiveness of the Ada WRA
研究概览
简要总结
This study aims to evaluate the performance of the suggestions made by the WRA by comparing Ada's list of suggested conditions and advice level to usual care and a gold-standard in a Romanian clinical setting.
详细描述
This pilot study investigates the performance of the Romanian version of Ada's Waiting Room Application in a clinical setting. The study will take place in a family doctor's practice in Cluj-Napoca, Romania. While waiting for their consultation with a family doctor, participants will complete an Ada assessment. The results of this assessment will not be available for viewing by the participants or the family practitioner. During and after consultation, the family practitioner will create two top 5 differential diagnoses list--one based on symptoms only and one based on physical examination and investigation results. The accuracy and comprehensiveness of Ada's differential diagnoses will be compared against the family practitioner's and a gold-standard.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 2 Months 至 60 Years（Child, Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •All patients under 60 years of age that enter the study sites and that are willing/able to provide consent will be included in the study, unless exclusion criteria are met.
排除标准
- •Patients with severe injury/illness requiring immediate treatment
- •Patients with traumatic injury
- •Patients incapable of completing a health assessment (e.g. due to illiteracy, mental impairment or inebriation or other incapacity)
- •Patients that are unfamiliar with mobile applications
- •Patients that are seeking treatment for a chronic condition
结局指标
主要结局
Accuracy and comprehensiveness of the Ada WRA
时间窗: about 5 months to gather the data
Accuracy and comprehensiveness of the Ada WRA assessment evaluated against the gold standard differential diagnosis from the panel.
次要结局
- Accuracy and comprehensiveness of the family practitioner(about 5 months to gather the data)
- Qualitative data on the chronology usability, usefulness and acceptance(about 3 months to gather the data)