MedPath

Observational Longitudinal Study of Pain in Men With Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Completed
Conditions
Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Interventions
Behavioral: Survey
Registration Number
NCT02008058
Lead Sponsor
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Brief Summary

This is a single-arm observational longitudinal study in of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer designed to assess the longitudinal trajectory of pain and other symptoms.

Detailed Description

This is a single-arm observational longitudinal study in of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer designed to assess the longitudinal trajectory of pain and other symptoms. The study aims to address several key methodological questions that will inform the design of future clinical trials with symptom endpoints in this population, including: the definition of "clinically meaningful" pain; criteria for concluding a clinically meaningful pain reduction; criteria for concluding clinically meaningful pain progression; reliable methods quantifying analgesic use (given that "equianalgesic tables" and "point scoring systems" are generally considered unreliable by pain researchers and regulatory agencies , , ); ideal recall periods for pain questions; tradeoffs of different frequencies of symptom reporting; symptom trajectories over time; and associations of pain scores with other metrics used in prostate cancer research (imaging, PSA values, circulating tumor cells, etc).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Male
Target Recruitment
213
Inclusion Criteria
  • The subject must be ≥ 18 years old on the day of consent.
  • The subject is able to understand written and spoken English
  • The patient must have histologically or cytologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma.
  • The subject must have castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)
  • The subject must have metastatic disease involving bone, seen on radiographic imaging (bone scan, CT scan, PET scan, or MRI).
  • The subject must be in a castrate state (e.g., currently receiving androgen deprivation therapy or have had an orchiectomy).
  • The subject must be starting any line treatment post-androgen deprivation/antiandrogen therapy, such as the following: chemotherapy (e.g., docetaxel, paclitaxel, carboplatin, cabazitaxel, or mitoxantrone); abiraterone acetate; MDV3100; ketoconazole; sipuleucel-T; Radium 223.
  • The subject owns or has regular access to a telephone (cellular or land line).
  • The subject is willing and able to self-report pain and analgesic use via an automated telephone system.
  • The subject is willing and able to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
  • The subject has small cell or predominantly neuroendocrine differentiated prostate tumor.

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Single ArmSurveySurveys, diaries, clinical assessments of men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Proportion of pain palliation responders6 weeks

Determine the proportion of pain palliation responders and the proportion experiencing pain progression will be presented along with 95% confidence intervals.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Clinical significance of pain score changes6 weeks

Determine the clinical significance of pain score changes. Pain score changes will be compared with each of the following "anchors": patient rating of change in pain, as well as changes in patient functional status, analgesic use, and various measures of disease status (imaging, PSA, circulating tumor cells). ROC curves derived using logistic regression analyses will be used to characterize the association between change in pain scores and clinically important improvement (defined by anchor variables).

Prevalence and trajectory of pain progression and pain palliation3 weeks

Descriptive statistics, including Kaplan-Meier, will be used to report findings for the proportion of asymptomatic men who ultimately develop pain, the median time until asymptomatic men develop pain, the median time until men with pain experience pain progression, and the median time until men with pain experience pain palliation.

Quantifying analgesic medication use26 months

Three different approaches to calculating a single value to represent total analgesic use will be compared: 1) equianalgesic tables published in guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) which convert various drugs and doses to "morphine equivalents"; 2) point scoring systems used in prior pivotal phase 3 trials based on the World Health Organization analgesic ladder in which lower points are assigned to weaker agents/doses and vice versa for stronger agents/doses; and 3) individual drug dose quantification, a dose recently suggested by the FDA but never empirically evaluated, in which each analgesic is considered individually and a 25% change in dose is considered an increase or decrease for each.

Frequency of pain reporting7 days

Seven consecutive days of reporting a pain item with a 24-hour recall item will be compared with a single administration of a pain item with a 7-day recall, in order to evaluate if the latter alone is sufficient for measuring pain.

Web-avidity of patients6 weeks

Identify the web-avidity of patients by summarizing patients' responses to questionnaire items about their use of internet and email.

Trial Locations

Locations (4)

Johns Hopkins University

🇺🇸

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

University of Washington

🇺🇸

Seattle, Washington, United States

Oregon Health and Science University

🇺🇸

Portland, Oregon, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath