Anatomical and Functional Outcomes of Perigee and Apogee Mesh in Total Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Versus Gynecare Prolift
- Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- Interventions
- Device: Gynecare Prolift MeshProcedure: Traditional SurgeryDevice: Perigee and Apogee Mesh
- Registration Number
- NCT03070873
- Lead Sponsor
- Nanjing Medical University
- Brief Summary
The investigators designed a prospective study in this article to evaluate the efficacy, the life quality and the complications of two different meshes of type I (one is Perigee/Apogee, the other is named Gynecare prolift) versus traditional surgery, and also studied the influence of some surgical procedures on the prognosis.
- Detailed Description
Pelvic organ prolapse is defined as a downward descent of the pelvic organs that results in the protrusion of vagina, uterus, or both. The investigators designed a prospective study in this article to evaluate the efficacy, the life quality and the complications of two different meshes of type I (one is Perigee/Apogee, the other is named Gynecare prolift) versus traditional surgery. The investigators also studied the influence of some surgical procedures on the prognosis. In this study,The investigators divided the patients randomly into three groups :the group A was a total of 91 patients who accepted transvaginal hysterectomy and total pelvic floor reconstruction combined Perigee and Apogee polypropylene mesh(PA);the group B was a total of 97 patients who accepted transvaginal hysterectomy and total pelvic floor reconstruction with Gynecare prolift polypropylene mesh;the group C was a total of 70 patients who accepted transvaginal hysterectomy and anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair without any mesh.The investigators did POP-Q measurements and questionnaire preoperatively and postoperatively and recorded volume of bleeding,day of postoperative indwelling catheter and the mesh complications。
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 258
- Patients with stage III ~ IV degree of anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse and uterine prolapse (total pelvic floor prolapse) by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) were included
- Simple anterior or posterior wall prolapse, simple uterine prolapse, combined with stress urinary incontinence, overactive bladder (OAB), pelvic floor repair surgery history and recurrent patients
- Local or systemic conditions that would preclude surgery or affect healing such as restricted leg motion (inability to conform to the lithotomy position)
- Vaginal bleeding;coagulation disorders
- Infection,or uncontrolled hypertension and diabetes mellitus
- Pelvic cancer and radiation to the pelvic area in the previous 6 months.
- Also women of reproductive age, and planning of pregnancy were also excluded for mesh usage.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description group B Gynecare Prolift Mesh accepted Gynecare prolift mesh group C Traditional Surgery Traditional surgery without any mesh group A Perigee and Apogee Mesh accepted Perigee and Apogee mesh(PA)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification at 24 months after surgery the prolapse of stage II and above is defined as recurrence in POP-Q stage.
mesh exposure at 24 months after surgery mesh was seen in the vagina by gynecological examination
sexual quality of life through the pelvic organ prolapse / urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire baseline PISQ-12
pelvic floor distress inventory short form baseline PFDI-20
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of constipation 1 months after surgery Day of postoperative indwelling catheter 1 months after surgery Volume of bleeding during the operation Elevated blood pressure during the operation stress urinary incontinence 3 months after surgery leakage of urine with exertion or with sneezing or coughing