MedPath

Anatomical and Functional Outcomes of Perigee and Apogee Mesh in Total Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Versus Gynecare Prolift

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Interventions
Device: Gynecare Prolift Mesh
Procedure: Traditional Surgery
Device: Perigee and Apogee Mesh
Registration Number
NCT03070873
Lead Sponsor
Nanjing Medical University
Brief Summary

The investigators designed a prospective study in this article to evaluate the efficacy, the life quality and the complications of two different meshes of type I (one is Perigee/Apogee, the other is named Gynecare prolift) versus traditional surgery, and also studied the influence of some surgical procedures on the prognosis.

Detailed Description

Pelvic organ prolapse is defined as a downward descent of the pelvic organs that results in the protrusion of vagina, uterus, or both. The investigators designed a prospective study in this article to evaluate the efficacy, the life quality and the complications of two different meshes of type I (one is Perigee/Apogee, the other is named Gynecare prolift) versus traditional surgery. The investigators also studied the influence of some surgical procedures on the prognosis. In this study,The investigators divided the patients randomly into three groups :the group A was a total of 91 patients who accepted transvaginal hysterectomy and total pelvic floor reconstruction combined Perigee and Apogee polypropylene mesh(PA);the group B was a total of 97 patients who accepted transvaginal hysterectomy and total pelvic floor reconstruction with Gynecare prolift polypropylene mesh;the group C was a total of 70 patients who accepted transvaginal hysterectomy and anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair without any mesh.The investigators did POP-Q measurements and questionnaire preoperatively and postoperatively and recorded volume of bleeding,day of postoperative indwelling catheter and the mesh complications。

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
258
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with stage III ~ IV degree of anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse and uterine prolapse (total pelvic floor prolapse) by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) were included
Exclusion Criteria
  • Simple anterior or posterior wall prolapse, simple uterine prolapse, combined with stress urinary incontinence, overactive bladder (OAB), pelvic floor repair surgery history and recurrent patients
  • Local or systemic conditions that would preclude surgery or affect healing such as restricted leg motion (inability to conform to the lithotomy position)
  • Vaginal bleeding;coagulation disorders
  • Infection,or uncontrolled hypertension and diabetes mellitus
  • Pelvic cancer and radiation to the pelvic area in the previous 6 months.
  • Also women of reproductive age, and planning of pregnancy were also excluded for mesh usage.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
group BGynecare Prolift Meshaccepted Gynecare prolift mesh
group CTraditional SurgeryTraditional surgery without any mesh
group APerigee and Apogee Meshaccepted Perigee and Apogee mesh(PA)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantificationat 24 months after surgery

the prolapse of stage II and above is defined as recurrence in POP-Q stage.

mesh exposureat 24 months after surgery

mesh was seen in the vagina by gynecological examination

sexual quality of life through the pelvic organ prolapse / urinary incontinence sexual questionnairebaseline

PISQ-12

pelvic floor distress inventory short formbaseline

PFDI-20

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of constipation1 months after surgery
Day of postoperative indwelling catheter1 months after surgery
Volume of bleedingduring the operation
Elevated blood pressureduring the operation
stress urinary incontinence3 months after surgery

leakage of urine with exertion or with sneezing or coughing

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath