MedPath

Stronger Family Through Art Therapy: a Mixed Methods Programme Evaluation Study

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Vulnerable Families
Registration Number
NCT06732297
Lead Sponsor
Nanyang Technological University
Brief Summary

The current research aims to evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of the Strong Family Through Art Therapy (SFAT) programme, which was developed to improve the parent-child relationship in vulnerable families. The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. Is the programme effective in enhancing quality of life and family resilience among parents?

2. Is the programme effective in enhancing quality of life among children?

3. Is the programme feasible and acceptable for large scale implementation in Singapore?

Researchers will compare participants before and after they take the programme and compare participants who take the programme with participants with participants who have not yet taken the programme to see if the programme is effective in benefiting participants. Researchers will also invite participants to discuss together and interview art therapists to see if the programme is feasible and acceptable.

Participants will

1. Take the 10-week SFAT programme

2. Complete assessment survey for 3 times

3. Attend a focus group discussion

Detailed Description

The current research aims to evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of the Strong Family Through Art Therapy (SFAT) programme, which was developed to improve the parent-child relationship in vulnerable families. Service users of the SFAT programme will receive a progressive support from workshops, dyad art therapy, and an innovative art-based self-care tool developed with a multidisciplinary team to meet the needs of enhancing family communication and strengthening emotional bonding. The current research utilizes a pragmatic mixed method research paradigm to evaluate the programme. For the quantitative component, a single-site, open label, Waitlist Randomized Control Trial (RCT) design, comprising two arms: (i) treatment group and (ii) waitlist control group, will be adopted to evaluate the efficacy of the Strong Family Through Art Therapy (SFAT) for improving quality of life and family resilience among parents and children. For the qualitative component, an embedded qualitative focus group evaluation study with participants who complete the SFAT programme, together with analysis of intervention session evaluation forms completed by the RPS art therapists who conduct the SFAT programme, will be conducted to evaluate programme acceptability and feasibility. After signing the informed consent form, the recruited family(consisting of one parent and one to three children dyads) will be asked to complete a baseline assessment before randomization and the start of the SFAT programme \[T1\]. Treatment group participants will then undergo an 10-week SFAT programme conducted by the RPS clinical team, complete an immediate post-intervention assessment \[T2\], with a final follow-up assessment at 20-weeks \[T3\]. The waitlist control group will complete a pre-intervention assessment before start of the SFAT programme at 10-weeks \[T2\], then undergo the same 10-week SFAT programme conducted by the RPS clinical team and complete an immediate post-intervention assessment at 20-weeks \[T3\]. Moreover, selected participants will be invited to take part in an acceptability focus group study after T3 assessments. Post-session evaluation forms will also be completed by RPS art therapists after session completion. Figure 1 details the study procedures.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
96
Inclusion Criteria
  • the caregiver (including parents, grandparents, family members or foster parents who perform the main caretaking responsibilities of the children taking part in SFAT) of a young child who can communicate in English and provide informed consent
  • the child is aged 7-14 years and can communicate in English
  • the family have one or more of the following identified challenges: (1) caregiver stress such as finances, household management, work and childcare arrangements, (2) caregiver struggles to find time for self-care and quality time with children, (3) caregiver has minimal understanding of the psychological and emotional needs of their children, (4) children face difficulties with emotional regulation and anger management
  • caregivers and children are from low-income families who receive financial assistance under the CHAS Blue card, ComCare financial assistance, and/or the MOE Financial Assistance Scheme
Exclusion Criteria
  • individuals who are suffering from depression or other major mental health conditions that would render their participation highly disruptive to others in a group setting, and/or cannot provide informed consent. Families will also be excluded if they are currently unstable (i.e. circumstances related to abuse/neglect), and/or have high risk of suicidal and self-harm behaviours. In the cases that individuals referred to the programme are not eligible, the partner organisations will assess their needs and refer them to programmes based on these needs.
  • participant is unable to provide informed consent

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Self-rated quality of life for childrenFrom enrollment to the end of assessment at 20 weeks

The primary outcome will be assessed by the KIDSCREEN-30 tool \[Ravens-Sieberer, U., et al., 2013\]. The KIDSCREEN-30 comprises of 30 items rated on a 4-point visual Likert scale and clustered into the 8 domains of physical wellbeing, psychological wellbeing, moods and emotions, autonomy and parent relation, financial resources, social support and peers, school environment and social acceptance. KIDSCREEN30 possesses strong internal validity, reliability, and cross-cultural applicability.

Self-rated quality of life for caregiversFrom enrollment to the end of assessment at 20 weeks

The primary outcome will be assessed by the World Health Organization Quality of life Brief Scale (WHOQOL-BREF) \[WHO, 1997\]. The WHOQOL-BREF comprises 26-items rated on a 5-point Likert scale and clustered into the four subscales of physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environmental health. The WHOQOL-BREF possesses strong internal validity, reliability, and cross-cultural applicability.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Self-rated family resilience for caregiversFrom enrollment to the end of assessment at 20 weeks

The secondary outcome will be assessed by the Walsh Family Resilience Questionnaire (WFRQ) \[Walsh, 2016\]. The WFRQ comprises 32 items rated on a 5- point Likert Scale and clustered into the 3 subscales of belief systems, organisational pattens, and communication/problem solving. The WFRQ possesses strong internal validity, reliability, and cross-cultural applicability

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

The Red Pencil Singapore

🇸🇬

Singapore, Singapore

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath