Comparative Evaluation Of Two Gum Surgical Techniques In Treatment Of Intrabony Defects
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K00-K14- Diseases of oral cavity and salivary glands
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/04/051756
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Bhumika Jhawar
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Age more than or equal to 18 years.
Presence of atleast one periodontal intrabony defect that must involve an anterior or premolar tooth or mesial surface of molar tooth.
Defect must be associated with >5mm.
No prior history of any surgical procedures on the site to be treated.
Systemically healthy subjects.
Exclusion Criteria
Tooth is periodontically hopeless (i.e. mobility >2 or furcation >2)
Previous periodontal surgery within last 2 years in the area of interest.
Pregnant and lactating women
Habit of tobacco use (smoked and smokeless)
Systemic conditions which are contraindication for periodontal surgery.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Minimally invasive flap approach would be showing better or same clinical results in correcting clinical parameter (probing pocket depth & relative clinical attachment level) when compared to conventional flap approach.Timepoint: baseline, 1 week, 3 month and 6 month
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Minimally invasive flap surgery, expected to show same or better clinical results in patient perception of pain, satisfaction and esthetics when compared to conventional flap surgery.Timepoint: baseline, 1 week, 3 month and 6 month