Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06082232
NCT06082232
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4

Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam as Adjuvants With Intrathecal Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia in High Tibial Osteotomy. A Randomized, Prospective, Double- Blinded, Comparative Study.

Assiut University0 sites90 target enrollmentNovember 1, 2023

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
Midazolam
Conditions
Postoperative Pain
Sponsor
Assiut University
Enrollment
90
Primary Endpoint
Time to first analgesic request
Status
Not yet recruiting
Last Updated
2 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative analgesic effect of intrathecal dexmedetomidine combined with bupivacaine and midazolam combined with bupivacaine in high tibial osteotomy.

Detailed Description

With more than 80% of patients experiencing acute pain following surgical procedures, and half of them reporting inadequate pain therapy, the control and management of post-surgical pain remains one of the most challenging aims of modern anesthesia. Adequate postoperative pain control is an important part of postoperative care treatment. World Health Organization, as well as International Association for the Study of Pain, have emphasized its significance for patients well-being, and determined pain relief to be a human right and the occurrence of pain as fifth vital sign. Local anesthetic, bupivacaine, is the most common agent used for spinal anesthesia but has relatively short duration of action. Many adjuvants to local anesthetics have been used intrathecally to improve the quality of intraoperative analgesia and prolong it in the postoperative period. Diverse classes of drugs such as opioids , epinephrine , neostigmine , magnesium , midazolam , ketamine , and clonidine have been added to intrathecal local anaesthetics in an attempt to prolong analgesia and reduce the incidence of adverse events. Opioids are commonly added to local anaesthetics to produce spinal and epidural anesthesia. However, significant adverse effects such as, urinary retention, respiratory depression, hemodynamic instability, pruritus and occasionally severe nausea and vomiting, may limit their use . α2-adrenergic agonists are new neuraxial adjuvants being studied to improve the quality of subarachnoid blockade regarding both sensory and motor blockades. There are many studies supporting their efficacy as adjuvants individually. Dexmedetomidine, a highly specific, potent, and selective α2-adrenergic agonist, provides stable hemodynamic conditions and good quality of intraoperative and prolonged postoperative analgesia with minimal side effects. Discovery of benzodiazepine receptors in spinal cord in 1977 triggered the use of intrathecal midazolam for prolongation of spinal anesthesia.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
November 1, 2023
End Date
December 30, 2024
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Factorial
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ahmed Sayed Ali Farghali

Doctor

Assiut University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult patients aged 18-60 years.
  • Gender: Both males and females.
  • Scheduled patients for High tibial osteotomy under spinal anesthesia.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status: I and II

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient refusal
  • Allergy to the studied drugs.
  • Patients with contraindications to spinal anesthesia.
  • Patients with advanced decompensated cardiac, respiratory,renal or hepatic diseases
  • Coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia
  • CNS diseases as epilepsy, stroke or psychiatric illness.

Arms & Interventions

Group M (midazolam group)

includes thirty patients who receive intrathecal 4 mL (20 mg) 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 1 mg midazolam (8 units of 5 mg/mL preservative-free midazolam loaded in a 40 unit insulin syringe).

Intervention: Midazolam

Group M (midazolam group)

includes thirty patients who receive intrathecal 4 mL (20 mg) 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 1 mg midazolam (8 units of 5 mg/mL preservative-free midazolam loaded in a 40 unit insulin syringe).

Intervention: Bupivacain

Group D(dexmedetomidine group)

includes thirty patients who receive intrathecal 4 mL (20 mg) 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 5 mcg dexmedetomidine (2 units of 100 mcg/mL preservative-free dexmedetomidine loaded in a 40 unit insulin syringe).

Intervention: Dexmedetomidine

Group D(dexmedetomidine group)

includes thirty patients who receive intrathecal 4 mL (20 mg) 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 5 mcg dexmedetomidine (2 units of 100 mcg/mL preservative-free dexmedetomidine loaded in a 40 unit insulin syringe).

Intervention: Bupivacain

Group C(control group)

includes thirty patients who receive intrathecal 4 mL (20 mg) 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.5 mL of 0.9% saline .

Intervention: Bupivacain

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Time to first analgesic request

Time Frame: 24 hours

Time to first analgesic request calculated from the administration of local anesthetic

Secondary Outcomes

  • analgesic consumption(24 hours)
  • Incidence of complications(24 hours)

Similar Trials