A randomised crossover trial comparing the laryngeal mask ProSeal and the i-gel supraglottic airway - Comparison of laryngeal mask ProSeal and i-gel

Osaka City General Hospital and Children's Hospital0 sites300 target enrollmentAugust 1, 2011

ConditionsDiseases requiring operation under general anesthesia

Overview

Phase: 未知
Intervention: Not specified
Conditions: Diseases requiring operation under general anesthesia
Sponsor: Osaka City General Hospital and Children's Hospital
Enrollment: 300
Status: Completed
Last Updated: 2 years ago

Overview Investigators Eligibility Criteria Outcomes Similar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

Ease of insertion and insertion success rate of the i-gel and the Proseal laryngeal mask airway were comparable, suggesting that both airway devices are able to be safely used in children. Fiberoptic view with the i-gel was better than that with the Proseal laryngeal mask airway.

Registry

who.int

Start Date

August 1, 2011

End Date

January 1, 2012

Last Updated

2 years ago

Study Type

Interventional

Sex

All

Investigators

Sponsor

Osaka City General Hospital and Children's Hospital

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

•1\. Patients with predicted difficulty in airway management including tracheal intubation 2\. Patients undergoing operations in prone position 3\. Patients with respiratory complications 4\. Patients with a history of abnormal reaction to anesthetics 5\. Patients with body weight more than 60 kg