JPRN-UMIN000006030Completed未知
A randomised crossover trial comparing the laryngeal mask ProSeal and the i-gel supraglottic airway - Comparison of laryngeal mask ProSeal and i-gel
Osaka City General Hospital and Children's Hospital0 sites300 target enrollmentStarted: August 1, 2011Last updated:
Conditions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- 未知
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 300
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Ease of insertion and insertion success rate of the i-gel and the Proseal laryngeal mask airway were comparable, suggesting that both airway devices are able to be safely used in children. Fiberoptic view with the i-gel was better than that with the Proseal laryngeal mask airway.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- ot applicable to 12years-old (—)
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
- •1. Patients with predicted difficulty in airway management including tracheal intubation 2. Patients undergoing operations in prone position 3. Patients with respiratory complications 4. Patients with a history of abnormal reaction to anesthetics 5. Patients with body weight more than 60 kg
Investigators
Similar Trials
Unknown
Not Applicable
Comparison of Laryngeal Mask and I-gel to Laryngoscope by Novice Operators in Simulated Difficult AirwayAirway ObstructionNCT02224027Yeungnam University College of Medicine109
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison Between Three Supraglottic Airway Devices ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway, Air-Q LMA and Ambu AuraGainProseal LMA vs Air-Q LMA vs Ambu AurGain LMANCT04045899Dr.Mahak Mehta150
Withdrawn
Not Applicable
Laryngeal Mask in Morbid ObesityMorbid ObesityNCT04243564University of Padova
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of the I-gel, Supreme and Proseal LMA in Paralyzed PatientsAirway Complication of AnaesthesiaNCT01909297Inonu University35
Completed
Not Applicable
I-Gel Versus Disposable Laryngeal Mask (LMA) for General Anesthesia (GA) With Controlled VentilationHealthyNCT00668278Northern Health and Social Care Trust200