A randomised crossover trial comparing the laryngeal mask ProSeal and the i-gel supraglottic airway
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Diseases requiring operation under general anesthesia
- Registration Number
- JPRN-UMIN000006030
- Lead Sponsor
- Osaka City General Hospital and Children's Hospital
- Brief Summary
Ease of insertion and insertion success rate of the i-gel and the Proseal laryngeal mask airway were comparable, suggesting that both airway devices are able to be safely used in children. Fiberoptic view with the i-gel was better than that with the Proseal laryngeal mask airway.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete: follow-up complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 300
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
1. Patients with predicted difficulty in airway management including tracheal intubation 2. Patients undergoing operations in prone position 3. Patients with respiratory complications 4. Patients with a history of abnormal reaction to anesthetics 5. Patients with body weight more than 60 kg
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method eak pressure
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Ease and time required for insertion and fiberoptic position