Oral Vasopressin Modulates Neural Responses to Looming Visual Stimuli: An Eye-tracking Study
- Registration Number
- NCT06329063
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
- Brief Summary
The main aim of the present study is to investigate the effects of orally administered vasopressin (AVP) on the perception of time-to-collision of threatening and non-threatening stimuli by combining a validated looming fear eye-tracking paradigm with a randomized between-subject placebo-controlled pharmacological trial design.
- Detailed Description
Animal models and initial findings in humans suggest a role of the AVP signaling system in socio-emotional processes. At the same time, the visual system's remarkable ability to perceive and interpret impending threats, notably through the "looming" phenomenon- a distinct pattern of optical expansion on the retina as objects approach, theoretically allows for precise estimation of the time-to-collision (TTC). It was recently demonstrated that the affective content of looming stimuli influences perceived TTC, with threatening objects judged as approaching sooner than non-threatening objects, hinting at a nuanced interaction between emotional valence and temporal perception. Within this context the present study aims to validate the effects of orally administered on the perception of time-to-collision of threatening and non-threatening stimuli. To this end, healthy individuals will undergo a double-blind, between-subjects, placebo-controlled pharmaco-eye-tracking experiment and receive a single oral dose of vasopressin (20 IU) or placebo before performing a looming visual stimuli task 45 minutes after administration. The task paradigm will encompass threatening (butterfly, rabbit) and non-threatening (spider, snake) stimuli
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 80
- Healthy subjects who volunteer to participate and are able to fully understand and agree with this study by written informed consent.
- Normal or corrected-normal version
- History of neuropsychiatric diseases.
- History of cardiac disease, including arrhythmias, aortic stenosis, or congestive heart failure; history of syncope or unexplained loss of consciousness.
- History of hepatic diseases, including cholestasis, biliary obstructive disease, or severe liver dysfunction.
- History of renal diseases, including renal stones or renal failure.
- History of hyponatremia(Serum sodium <135mmol/L) or hyperkalemia (Serum potassium>5.5mmol/L); history of diabetes mellitus or diabetes insipidus
- Known hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any medication or hormone; strong allergic reaction to food.
- Infections such as COVID-19 or influenza, or unexplained fever.
- Subjects with hypertension (BP ≥130/80mmHg) or hypotension (BP ≤ 90/60mmHg).
- History of alcohol or drug abuse; smoker (≥ 10 cigarettes or ≥ 3 cigars or ≥ 3 pipes/day); smoker using e-cigarettes.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Placebo group Placebo Drug: Placebo Vasopressin group Vasopressin Drug: Vasopressin (20IU)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Ratio of judged-time-to-collision to actual-time-to-collision for threatening versus non-threatening stimuli after oral vasopressin administration 75 minutes - 105 minutes after treatment Comparison of the ratio between the judged time to collision and the actual time to collision between the treatment groups for threatening (spider, snake) and non-threatening (rabbit, butterfly) stimuli.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Fixation duration(ms) for threatening versus non-threatening stimuli after oral vasopressin administration 75 minutes - 105 minutes after treatment Comparison of mean fixation durations between treatment groups for threatening (spider, snake) and non-threatening (rabbit, butterfly) stimuli.
First saccade latency(ms) for threatening versus non-threatening stimuli after oral vasopressin administration 75 minutes - 105 minutes after treatment Comparison of first saccade latencies between treatment groups for threatening (spider, snake) and non-threatening (rabbit, butterfly) stimuli.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
🇨🇳Chendu, Sichuan, China