Value Analysis in Patients Undergoing Self-Management Training Using a Coagulometer
- Conditions
- Post-Cardiac Surgery Patients
- Interventions
- Other: Standard of Care (SOC)Other: Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM)
- Registration Number
- NCT06423521
- Lead Sponsor
- Ana Rita Londral, PhD
- Brief Summary
Prior research has not assessed the value of remote patient monitoring (RPM) systems for patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy after cardiac surgery. This study aims to assess whether the clinical follow-up through RPM yields comparable outcomes with the standard protocol. A crossover trial assigned participants to SOC-RPM or RPM-SOC, starting with the standard of care (SOC) for the first 6 months after surgery and using RPM for the following 6 months, or vice-versa, respectively. During RPM, patients used the Coaguchek© to accurately measure International Normalized Ratio values and a mobile text-based chatbot to report PROs and adjust the therapeutic dosage. The study assessed patients' and clinicians' experience with RPM and compared direct costs.
- Detailed Description
The main objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the outcomes and costs of a digital clinical service to support patients with anticoagulant therapy after cardiac surgery. This study used an RPM-based system with a portable coagulometer for clinical follow-up and self-management of INR control and compared with the standard of care (SOC). In addition, this study seeks to assess patients' and clinical teams' satisfaction and experience.
Patients were recruited in sequential order based on their availability in the cardiothoracic surgery department. The participants were assigned into two arms: one would follow the SOC for the first six months and then receive the RPM intervention for the following six months (SOC-RPM); the other group would receive the intervention (RPM) for the first six months and then follow the SOC for the remaining six months (RPM-SOC). Blinding was not feasible due to the nature of the trial, and both patients and the clinical team were aware of the follow-up being conducted. In this study, it was decided that a washout period was not required. This was because withdrawing effective follow-up care for a washout period is not possible, as patients need to be constantly monitored to ensure effective treatment, thus preventing thromboembolic events. The study was conducted for twelve months, as follows:
1. Patients received a kit with a Coagulometer-CoaguChek® (Roche Diagnostics, Switzerland) and the necessary test strips for use during the period established, as well as written instructions on how to take the measurements, and were registered on the monitoring platform.
2. Patients received periodic text messages on their smartphones to report the INR value, and they responded to messages regarding their symptoms related to anticoagulant therapy and the INR value.
3. The clinical team received notifications if patients' reports had been assessed outside therapeutic standards and then sent a text message back with the medication adjustment.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 28
- equal or more than 18 years old and with a smartphone
- analphabetism, poor health, low digital literacy level and inability to use the RPM alone or with caregiver support
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description SOC-RPM Standard of Care (SOC) SOC-RPM arm, would follow the Standard of Care (SOC) for the first six months and then receive the Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM). RPM-SOC Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) RPM-SOC arm: would receive the intervention (RPM) for the first six months and then follow the SOC for the remaining six months.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) for International Normalized Ratio (INR) From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 months The primary endpoint was the patient's TTR for INR values among the programs, i.e., a comparison between SOC and RPM over time. The TTR for INR value was self-measured by the portable monitor and calculated by the Rosendaal method of lineal interpolation
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Costs From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 months The method used in the trial compared the average cost per patient in standard of care (SOC) versus remote patient monitoring (RPM) using the Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) method from the perspective of the Public National Healthcare Service (NHS). The method involved mapping patient pathway activities and identifying direct costs such as healthcare professionals, facilities, equipment and technology, and consumables. Costs for healthcare professionals, equipment and technology, and facilities were determined based on market value, depreciation rate, and public salary scale. Travel costs for patients undergoing SOC were considered, and all monetary values are in Euros as of 2023.
Number of events of hypocoagulation symptoms From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 months Zero is equivalent to no hypoagulation symptoms and more than one indicates a symptom
Patient Experience and Satisfaction From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 months . A questionnaire with 13 self-reported questions was used to evaluate patient experience and satisfaction. The first four questions measured experience, while the following nine focused on satisfaction. The responses were rated on a scale of disagree to agree, with 1-4 points assigned to each response. To prevent ceiling and floor effects in our tool, the questions numbered '2', '11', and '12' were calculated as "inverted," and an optional open question was included. The questionnaire used to assess experience and satisfaction is not validated, precluding external validity. Still, it was used due to the lack of instruments in Portuguese language to assess the experience and satisfaction of digital health RPM-based systems.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Hospital de Santa Marta
🇵🇹Lisboa, Portugal