Combination of Rectal Indomethacin and Pancreatic Duct Stenting Versus Indomethacin Alone in Preventing PEP
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Interventions
- Device: Pancreatic duct stenting
- Registration Number
- NCT04340687
- Lead Sponsor
- Air Force Military Medical University, China
- Brief Summary
Rectal indomethacin and pancreatic duct (PD) stenting (PDS) are recommended for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). However, the effects of the combination of the two methods on preventing PEP are controversial. We hypothesized that some group of patients with difficult cannulation might benefit from the combination of indomethacin plus PDS (IP) compared with indomethacin alone (IN).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 664
- Patients underwent diagnostic or therapeutic ERCP
- With native papilla
- With difficult cannulation (cannulation time >10min or cannulation attempts >5 times or inadvertently PD cannulation ≥1)
- Receiving post-ERCP rectal indomethacin
- Patients with indications of PD cannulation
- No attempt of cannulation due to inaccessible papilla
- Non-difficult cannulation
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description IP group Pancreatic duct stenting All patients recevied pancreatic duct stent during ERCP and one single dose of 100mg rectal indomethacin after ERCP.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Overall PEP 30 days PEP was diagnosed if there was a worsening or new onset of pain in the upper abdomen, an elevation in serum amylase of at least three times of the upper limit of the normal range 24h after the procedure and requiring at least two nights of hospitalization.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Overall ERCP related complication 30 days
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases
🇨🇳Xi'an, Shaanxi, China