MedPath

APPROPRIATE - Rate Adaptive Pacing Sensor

Not Applicable
Terminated
Conditions
Heart Diseases
Interventions
Device: Rate adaptive pacemaker
Registration Number
NCT00757666
Lead Sponsor
Boston Scientific Corporation
Brief Summary

The APPROPRIATE study will compare differences in functional capacity (peak VO2) between chronotropically incompetent patients randomized to receive rate responsive pacing driven by either the minute ventilation (respiration-based) sensor or an accelerometer (motion-based).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
566
Inclusion Criteria
  • Meets or met current pacemaker implantation indications
  • Willing and capable of providing informed consent for participation
  • Receiving a dual-chamber pacemaker or previously received a dual-chamber pacemaker with active atrial and ventricular leads
  • Plans to remain in the long-term care of his/her enrolling physician and is available for study follow-up for three months post-enrollment
Exclusion Criteria
  • Mobitz II second degree heart block

  • Third degree heart block

  • Chronic atrial fibrillation or uncontrolled atrial arrhythmias within the past 90 days prior to consent

  • Neuromuscular, orthopedic, or vascular disability that prevents normal walking or weight carrying (e.g., intermittent claudication, arthritis, residual stroke weakness, need for a wheelchair or walker)

  • A symptom-limited exercise protocol is thought to be dangerous or contra-indicated, including but not limited to changing pattern of chest discomfort or uncontrolled arrhythmias

  • Pulmonary disease as defined by any one of the following:

    • Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) or Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) < 60% of predicted values
    • Use of two or more pulmonary inhalers
    • Use of supplemental oxygen
    • Chronic use of oral steroids for pulmonary disease treatment
  • Life expectancy is less than 12 months due to other medical conditions, per physician discretion

  • Has or indicated for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D)

  • Currently enrolled in another investigational study that would directly impact the treatment or outcome of the current study.

  • Younger than 18 years of age

  • Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study (method of assessment upon physician's discretion)

  • Unable or unwilling to comply with the protocol requirements

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
AccelerometerRate adaptive pacemakerPatients implanted with a Boston Scientific ALTRUA 60 pacemaker with accelerometer (motion-based) sensor.
Minute VentilationRate adaptive pacemakerPatients implanted with a Boston Scientific ALTRUA 60 pacemaker with minute ventilation sensor.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean Change in Functional Capacity (Peak VO2).1 month and 2 months post-implant

The APPROPRIATE Study compared differences in functional capacity (peak VO2) between CI patients randomized to receive rate responsive pacing driven by either the minute ventilation (respiration-based) sensor or by an accelerometer (motion-based) sensor.

The mean change in functional capactity will be compared against baseline; changes from baseline will be measured.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Changes in Heart Rate During Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Using a Lift and Carry Test2 months post-implant

This outcome measure will be compared against baseline.

Metabolic Chronotropic Relationship (MCR) Slope1 month and 2 months post-implant
Exercise Time1 month and 2 months post-implant
VO2 at Ventilatory Threshold1 month and 2 months post-implant

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Cardiology Association of NE Arkansas

🇺🇸

Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States

Genesis Heart Institute

🇺🇸

Davenport, Iowa, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath