APPROPRIATE - Rate Adaptive Pacing Sensor
- Conditions
- Heart Diseases
- Interventions
- Device: Rate adaptive pacemaker
- Registration Number
- NCT00757666
- Lead Sponsor
- Boston Scientific Corporation
- Brief Summary
The APPROPRIATE study will compare differences in functional capacity (peak VO2) between chronotropically incompetent patients randomized to receive rate responsive pacing driven by either the minute ventilation (respiration-based) sensor or an accelerometer (motion-based).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 566
- Meets or met current pacemaker implantation indications
- Willing and capable of providing informed consent for participation
- Receiving a dual-chamber pacemaker or previously received a dual-chamber pacemaker with active atrial and ventricular leads
- Plans to remain in the long-term care of his/her enrolling physician and is available for study follow-up for three months post-enrollment
-
Mobitz II second degree heart block
-
Third degree heart block
-
Chronic atrial fibrillation or uncontrolled atrial arrhythmias within the past 90 days prior to consent
-
Neuromuscular, orthopedic, or vascular disability that prevents normal walking or weight carrying (e.g., intermittent claudication, arthritis, residual stroke weakness, need for a wheelchair or walker)
-
A symptom-limited exercise protocol is thought to be dangerous or contra-indicated, including but not limited to changing pattern of chest discomfort or uncontrolled arrhythmias
-
Pulmonary disease as defined by any one of the following:
- Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) or Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) < 60% of predicted values
- Use of two or more pulmonary inhalers
- Use of supplemental oxygen
- Chronic use of oral steroids for pulmonary disease treatment
-
Life expectancy is less than 12 months due to other medical conditions, per physician discretion
-
Has or indicated for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D)
-
Currently enrolled in another investigational study that would directly impact the treatment or outcome of the current study.
-
Younger than 18 years of age
-
Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study (method of assessment upon physician's discretion)
-
Unable or unwilling to comply with the protocol requirements
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Accelerometer Rate adaptive pacemaker Patients implanted with a Boston Scientific ALTRUA 60 pacemaker with accelerometer (motion-based) sensor. Minute Ventilation Rate adaptive pacemaker Patients implanted with a Boston Scientific ALTRUA 60 pacemaker with minute ventilation sensor.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mean Change in Functional Capacity (Peak VO2). 1 month and 2 months post-implant The APPROPRIATE Study compared differences in functional capacity (peak VO2) between CI patients randomized to receive rate responsive pacing driven by either the minute ventilation (respiration-based) sensor or by an accelerometer (motion-based) sensor.
The mean change in functional capactity will be compared against baseline; changes from baseline will be measured.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Changes in Heart Rate During Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Using a Lift and Carry Test 2 months post-implant This outcome measure will be compared against baseline.
Metabolic Chronotropic Relationship (MCR) Slope 1 month and 2 months post-implant Exercise Time 1 month and 2 months post-implant VO2 at Ventilatory Threshold 1 month and 2 months post-implant
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Cardiology Association of NE Arkansas
🇺🇸Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States
Genesis Heart Institute
🇺🇸Davenport, Iowa, United States