Observing how videolaryngoscope-guided versus regular blind placement of I-gel supraglottic airway device works in older patients undergoing general anesthesia
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/02/062888
- Lead Sponsor
- AIIMS Patna
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Patients planned for elective surgery of duration less than three hours under general anesthesia will be included in the study
ASAPS Grade one two three
BMI less than thirty five
Exclusion Criteria
High risk of aspiration
Unstable vital signs
Cervical spine problems
BMI more than thirty five
Abnormality of the oral cavity or pharynx High possibility of respiratory complications
Patient refusal for participation in the study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the incidence of malposition of Igel using video laryngoscopy guided versus conventional blind insertion technique <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 2 minutes after induction <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To evaluate and compare <br/ ><br>-the oropharyngeal leak pressure <br/ ><br>-Number of attempts required for the successful placement <br/ ><br>-Insertion time <br/ ><br>-Postoperative airway morbidityTimepoint: From induction to twenty minutes