MedPath

Milk Versus a Pea-based Beverage for Bone and Muscle Health in Young Athletes

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Muscle Atrophy
Interventions
Dietary Supplement: Nutritional supplementation during a 6 month resistance training program
Registration Number
NCT05382026
Lead Sponsor
University of Saskatchewan
Brief Summary

Canada's Food Guide places an increased emphasis on plant-based proteins; however, Canadians who consume a plant-based diet may be compromised because of intake of lower-quality protein. Consumption of high-quality protein is important during growth and development, especially in highly active individuals. The study will compare milk (i.e. high quality protein) to a pea-based beverage (i.e. lower quality plant-based protein) in adolescent boys and girls who are engaged in resistance-training programs as part of their athletic training. One-hundred and fourteen adolescent boys and girls (12-17y of age) will be divided into groups that consume milk, a pea-beverage, or a carbohydrate (sugar) beverage after resistance training sessions performed three times per week for six months. It is predicted that the group consuming milk will have greater increases in muscle mass, strength, and bone density, and greater reductions in fat mass compared to the groups consuming a pea-based or carbohydrate beverages.

Detailed Description

Milk protein is important especially for very active people and in the context of plant-based diets, which are lower in protein quality. The purpose of the study is to compare the effectiveness of milk supplementation to pea-beverage supplementation during resistance training programs for increasing lean tissue mass in adolescent boys and girls. Secondary and tertiary outcomes include fat mass, bone mineral density, and muscular strength. It is hypothesized that milk supplementation during resistance training will be more effective than plant-based proteins (i.e. pea-beverage) for increasing muscle mass, reducing fat mass, and improving bone mineral outcomes in adolescent boys and girls. One-hundred and fourteen boys and girls (aged 12-17y) who are currently enrolled in resistance training programs (3 times per week for 6 months) as part of their competitive athletic programs will be stratified by sex and maturity status before being randomized to three groups: 1) 1% chocolate milk supplementation; 2) pea-based beverage; 3) carbohydrate beverage (placebo control). Beverages will be consumed during recovery from each resistance training session (i.e. 250 ml immediately after training and 250 ml one hour later to optimize post-exercise protein synthesis) over the six-month intervention. It is anticipated that milk supplementation will be more effective than plant-based protein supplementation.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
112
Inclusion Criteria
  • Currently participating in a resistance-training program 3 times per week
  • Female participants must have reached menarche
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Have taken any nutritional supplement (e.g., protein, creatine, amino acids) within the past month
  • Currently taking anabolic steroids or oral corticosteroids
  • Allergies to dairy, almonds, cashews, or peas
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
1% chocolate milkNutritional supplementation during a 6 month resistance training program250 ml of 1% chocolate milk consumed immediately after resistance training sessions + 250 ml of chocolate milk consumed 1 hour after resistance training sessions
Placebo: Low protein plant-based beverageNutritional supplementation during a 6 month resistance training program250 ml of placebo beverage consumed immediately after resistance training sessions + 250 ml of placebo beverage consumed 1 hour after resistance training sessions
Pea-based beverageNutritional supplementation during a 6 month resistance training program250 ml of pea beverage consumed immediately after resistance training sessions + 250 ml of pea beverage consumed 1 hour after resistance training sessions
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in lean tissue mass (kg)6 months

Lean tissue mass measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in cortical thickness at the hip (cm)6 months

Cortical thickness measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

Change in fat mass (kg)6 months

Fat mass measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

Change in bench press strength (kg)6 months

Bench press strength predicted from resistance lifted for 6-10 repetitions

Change in squat strength (kg)6 months

Squat strength predicted from resistance lifted for 6-10 repetitions

Change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (g/cm-squared)6 months

Lumbar spine bone mineral density measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

Change in hip bone mineral density (g/cm-squared)6 months

Hip bone mineral density measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

Change in cross-sectional area at the hip (cm-squared)6 months

Cross-sectional area measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

Change in cross-sectional moment of inertia at the hip (cm to the power of 4)6 months

Cross-sectional moment of inertia measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

Change in buckling ratio at the hip (no units)6 months

Buckling ratio measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

Change in section modulus at the hip (cm to the power of 3)6 months

Section modulus measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Saskatchewan

🇨🇦

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath