Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04831671
NCT04831671UnknownNot Applicable

A Pilot Randomised Prospective Comparison of Two Approaches for Tibial Nailing Using Clinical and Novel Imaging Outcome Measures

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust2 sites in 1 country20 target enrollmentStarted: April 1, 2022Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
20
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Change in cartilage appearance by MRI Assessment

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Fractures of the tibia (shin bone) are frequently treated with a metal nail that is passed down the inside of the bone (an intra-medullary nail). This nail is inserted through the top of the tibia at the level of the knee joint. There are two ways for the nail to be inserted - either through an incision below the patella (kneecap) or above the patella.

The benefit of the incision above the patella is that it can make it technically easier to insert the nail into the correct position. However, the perceived risk of damage to the knee cartilage has prevented this technique from being widely adopted.

The investigators will use MRI scanning to assess the cartilage for damage using both techniques. The results will enable the investigators to determine if the theoretical risk of cartilage damage is found in real-world scenarios and to generate data for further, larger studies.

Detailed Description

Intra-medullary nailing is a common form of treatment for a variety of tibial shaft fractures. Traditionally this has been done via an infra-patella approach. More recently the use of a supra-patella approach has become more popular. However, there are concerns that the supra-patella approach may cause unacceptable damage to the cartilage of the patello-femoral joint (PFJ).

This study will use a novel MRI technique developed at the University of Cambridge to compare the amount of damage caused to the knee joint by both infra- and supra-patella nailing techniques. Specific cartilage assessment sequences will enable a fuller assessment of cartilage damage than can be achieved with normal structural sequences. Participants will also be asked to complete Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) regarding their injury to assess their clinical outcome.

Infra-patella and supra-patella nailing techniques are now both routine methods of carrying out intra-medullary nailing of the tibia. Further evidence is required, however, in order to fully assess whether one method is superior to the other.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Masking Description

It is not possible to mask participants or investigators as the surgical interventions in each arm will have different scars, making blinding impossible.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 50 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Closed tibial shaft fracture suitable for intramedullary nailing
  • Able to consent
  • Able to undergo MRI scanning
  • Able to attend follow up for 6 months post operatively
  • Suitable for surgery

Exclusion Criteria

  • Polytrauma
  • Ipsilateral acute ligamentous knee injury
  • A contra-indication to MRI scanning

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in cartilage appearance by MRI Assessment

Time Frame: Pre-intervention, Day 1 post operatively, 6 months

Change in cartilage appearance of the ipsilateral knee using MRI scanning

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in EQ-5D-5L(Pre-interventional , 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months)
  • Change in Lysholm Knee Score(Pre-intervention, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months)
  • Change in Tegner Activity Scale(Pre-intervention, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Mr Andrew Carrothers

Consultant Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgeon

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials