CTRI/2022/12/048106
Not Yet Recruiting
Phase 2
on Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation(NIPPV) versus Conventional Mechanical Ventilation(CMV) in CPAP failed preterm babies â?? a non-inferiority study
JSS hospital0 sites0 target enrollmentTBD
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Not specified
- Sponsor
- JSS hospital
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 3 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Babies who are \< 37 completed weeks
- •Respiratory distress requiring CPAP support for at least 2 hours
- •SOPI \>1\.6
Exclusion Criteria
- •Babies having Major congenital anomalies
- •Congenital heart Disease excluding small ASD/VSD
- •Baby requiring major surgeries
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Recruiting
N/A
on Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) or conventional mechanical ventilation for neonatal respiratory failureRespiratory failureRespiratory - Other respiratory disorders / diseasesReproductive Health and Childbirth - Complications of newbornACTRN12613000346774Isfahan university of medical sciences50
Completed
N/A
Comparing non-invasive respiratory support methods following surgery in neonates with risk of extubation failureExtubation failure in neonatesSurgeryExtubation failureISRCTN94827278The Great Orchestra of Christmas Charity (Poland)300
Completed
N/A
Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation and Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNCT00644930Eskisehir Osmangazi University20
Completed
N/A
Using Positive Pressure Ventilation for Preoxygenation During Panendoscopy.ENT Cancer ScreeningNCT02167334Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens50
Completed
Phase 4
Non Invasive Pressure Support Ventilation (NIPPV) Versus Recruitment Maneuver (RM) and PreoxygenationObesityNCT00852384University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand60