CTRI/2022/12/048106尚未招募2 期
on Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation(NIPPV) versus Conventional Mechanical Ventilation(CMV) in CPAP failed preterm babies â?? a non-inferiority study
JSS hospital0 个研究点目标入组 0 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 2 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •Babies who are < 37 completed weeks
- •Respiratory distress requiring CPAP support for at least 2 hours
- •SOPI >1.6
排除标准
- •Babies having Major congenital anomalies
- •Congenital heart Disease excluding small ASD/VSD
- •Baby requiring major surgeries
研究者
相似试验
招募中
不适用
on Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) or conventional mechanical ventilation for neonatal respiratory failureRespiratory - Other respiratory disorders / diseasesReproductive Health and Childbirth - Complications of newbornRespiratory failureACTRN12613000346774Isfahan university of medical sciences50
已完成
不适用
Comparing non-invasive respiratory support methods following surgery in neonates with risk of extubation failureExtubation failure in neonatesSurgeryExtubation failureISRCTN94827278The Great Orchestra of Christmas Charity (Poland)300
已完成
不适用
Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation and Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNCT00644930Eskisehir Osmangazi University20
已完成
不适用
Using Positive Pressure Ventilation for Preoxygenation During Panendoscopy.ENT Cancer ScreeningNCT02167334Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens50
已完成
4 期
Non Invasive Pressure Support Ventilation (NIPPV) Versus Recruitment Maneuver (RM) and PreoxygenationObesityNCT00852384University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand60