Effectiveness of an Endurance Exercise Programme Preceded by Ischaemic Preconditioning in Older People
- Conditions
- Older People
- Interventions
- Other: IPC + Exercise protocolOther: Sham IPC + Exercise protocol
- Registration Number
- NCT05144815
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Valencia
- Brief Summary
In recent decades, the proportion of people over 65 years of age is increasing rapidly, due to rising life expectancy and declining fertility rates. According to the World Health Organization, people in this age group will constitute 22% of the population by 2050, up from the current 12% (WHO, 2018). Therefore, improving quality of life (healthspan) and preventing disability has become a public health challenge (Olshansky, 2018).
In this context, physical exercise has been shown to be able to prevent sarcopenia, functional decline, the presence of chronic diseases and even mortality in this group (Izquierdo et al., 2021; Lazarus, Lord, \& Harridge, 2019).
A training method that could enhance the benefits of walking is ischaemic preconditioning (IPC), characterised by the application of brief periods of circulatory occlusion-reperfusion to a limb, minutes to hours prior to exercise. This type of intervention, initially used to delay/prevent cell damage in patients with myocardial infarction (Murry, Jennings, \& Reimer, 1986), has recently shown beneficial effects in young people to improve physical performance in a wide variety of sports (Caru, Levesque, Lalonde, \& Curnier, 2019), as well as to improve recovery from associated muscle damage (Franz et al., 2018), which is of particular interest in the adult population. In fact, the application of IPC alone for two weeks has been shown to improve walking speed and reduce fatigue in post-stroke patients (Durand et al., 2019), promising effects that could be increased when applied prior to resistance training, such as walking.
Thus, the objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of an endurance exercise programme preceded by ischaemic preconditioning on parameters related to physical function, cognitive status and quality of life in older people. In addition, we set out to compare the acute and chronic effect of the proposed interventions.
- Detailed Description
In recent decades, the proportion of people over 65 years of age is increasing rapidly, due to rising life expectancy and declining fertility rates. According to the World Health Organization, people in this age group will constitute 22% of the population by 2050, up from the current 12% (WHO, 2018). Therefore, improving quality of life (healthspan) and preventing disability has become a public health challenge (Olshansky, 2018).
In this context, physical exercise has been shown to be able to prevent sarcopenia, functional decline, the presence of chronic diseases and even mortality in this group (Izquierdo et al., 2021; Lazarus, Lord, \& Harridge, 2019).
Resistance or endurance training can improve sarcopenia, reduce intramuscular fat accumulation, improve muscle function, among others. Aerobic exercise has been shown to be effective in maintaining muscle mass and strength in older adults is walking (Kubo et al., 2008). In fact, walking can also improve VO2max in older adults when intensities are above ∼40% VO2max (Nemoto, Gen-no, Masuki, Okazaki, \& Nose, 2007). In addition, it has been linked to the prevention of cognitive decline (Maki et al., 2012) and improvements in quality of life (Awick et al., 2015) in older people.
A training method that could enhance the benefits of walking is ischaemic preconditioning (IPC), characterised by the application of brief periods of circulatory occlusion-reperfusion to a limb, minutes to hours prior to exercise. This type of intervention, initially used to delay/prevent cell damage in patients with myocardial infarction (Murry, Jennings, \& Reimer, 1986), has recently shown beneficial effects in young people to improve physical performance in a wide variety of sports (Caru, Levesque, Lalonde, \& Curnier, 2019), as well as to improve recovery from associated muscle damage (Franz et al., 2018), which is of particular interest in the adult population. In fact, the application of IPC alone for two weeks has been shown to improve walking speed and reduce fatigue in post-stroke patients (Durand et al., 2019), promising effects that could be increased when applied prior to resistance training, such as walking.
Thus, the objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of an endurance exercise programme preceded by ischaemic preconditioning on parameters related to physical function, cognitive status and quality of life in older people. In addition, we set out to compare the acute and chronic effect of the proposed interventions.
Therefore, this study is a randomized clinical trial in which three groups of twenty people in each group will participate, with different interventions:
* Experimental group 1: Exercise protocol + IPC.
* Experimental group 2: Exercise protocol + sham IPC.
* Control group. Participants will be evaluated in four moments, at baseline, immediately after the first session, postintervention (after 6-week intervention) and 4-week follow-up.
Data analysis will be performed with SPSS statistic program (v26). Normality and homoscedasticity will be analyzed by Shapiro-Wilk t-test and Levene test, respectively. For comparation between groups Bonferroni will be used. If any confusion factor that not meet requirements to be analysed like a covariable exist, ANCOVA will be used. When p\<0.0.5 statistical significant differences will be assumed.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 31
- Age between 65 -90 years
- Physically inactive (< 150 minutes of physical activity per week).
- Signed informed consent form
- Institutionalised patients.
- History of stroke in the last 6 months or hospital admission for any reason in the last 3 months.
- Uncontrolled hypertension.
- Medication with anticoagulants.
- Oncological patient with active treatment: chemotherapy or radiotherapy.
- Neurological or cardiovascular musculoskeletal pathology that contraindicates physical activity.
- Cognitive impairment (score below 25 on the "Mini-mental Test"); or severe disability (score below 15 points on the Barthel scale).
- Completion of less than 80% of training sessions.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description IPC + Exercise protocol group IPC + Exercise protocol Patients in this group (n=16) will undergo ischaemic preconditioning (IPC) plus an endurance training protocol. Sham IPC + Exercise protocol group Sham IPC + Exercise protocol Patients in this group (n=16) will undergo sham ischaemic preconditioning (IPC) plus an endurance training protocol.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Heart rate variability during walking 40 minutes Heart rate monitor RS800CX (Polar Electro Oy Kempele, Finland).
Cardiorespiratory fitness 8 minutes "6 minutes walking test" (6MWT)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method General physical condition 5 minutes Short Physical Performance Battery
Health-related Quality of Life 2 minutes EQ-5D-5L
Lower limb strength: for the assessment of isometric strength 10 minutes A load cell (CTCS; Mutronic) will be used to measure the strength of the intrinsic and extrinsic muscles of the hip, knee and ankle
Muscle mass (sacopenia) 3 minutes Bioimpedance (Tanita DC-430MA, Tanita Corporation of America, Inc., Arlington Heights, IL, USA).
Fall risk, agility and dynamic balance 3 minutes Fall skip
Fatigue 1 minute Borg scale 20
Independence in basic activities of daily living (BADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) 5 minutes Barthel Index and Lawton and Brody scale, respectively
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Elena Muñoz
🇪🇸Valencia, Valencia / València, Spain
Marta Inglés
🇪🇸Valencia, Spain