MedPath

Comparison Between Unilateral Versus Bilateral Stenting for Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction to Use a LCD Stent

Not Applicable
Withdrawn
Conditions
Gall Bladder Cancer
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Cholangiocarcinoma
Obstruction of Biliary Tree
Malignant Lymphadenopathy
Registration Number
NCT01875549
Lead Sponsor
Kwang Hyuck Lee
Brief Summary

Internal biliary drainage is an useful method for a control of jaundice and cholangitis to patients who had a malignant hilar obstruction due to hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, gall bladder cancer or metastatic lymphadenopathy.

Bilateral biliary drainage is more physiologic but technically difficult to compared with unilateral biliary drainage specially related to conformability and flexibility between using stents.

There are no prospective clinical trials compared with these internal biliary drainage methods in hilar malignant obstruction using metal stent.

Therefore, the investigators want to compare the clinical outcome of two method: Unilateral biliary stent and Bilateral biliary stent

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
WITHDRAWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
Not specified
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age> 18
  • diagnosis of malignancy in pathology or cytology
  • jaundice(Total bilirubin)> 2.0 mg/dL
  • Diagnosed malignant hilar invasion to CT or other image finding
Exclusion Criteria
  • bleeding tendency(INR>1.5)
  • Pregnancy
  • severe liver,kidney disease

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Stent patencyup to 1year

Participants will followed for the new obstruction(new jaundice) will occur.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
survival periodup to 1year

Participants will followed for 1year.

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.