Primary Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Replacement Versus Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing in Young Active Patients

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Indications for a Total Hip Prosthesis

• Registration Number: NCT00285129
• Lead Sponsor: University Hospital, Ghent

Brief Summary

Comparison of the functional result and speed of rehabilitation between two types of hip prostheses: primary ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement versus metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2004-01
• Study Completion: 2004-12
• Study First Submitted: 2006-01-31
• Study First Submitted QC: 2006-01-31
• Study First Posted: 2006-02-01
• Status Verified: 2007-12
• Last Update Submitted: 2007-12-19
• Last Update Posted: 2007-12-28

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 400

Inclusion Criteria

• Total hip replacement

Exclusion Criteria

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Functional result
Speed of rehabilitation

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University Hospital Ghent; 🇧🇪 Ghent, Belgium