Primary Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Replacement Versus Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing in Young Active Patients
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Indications for a Total Hip Prosthesis
- Registration Number
- NCT00285129
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital, Ghent
- Brief Summary
Comparison of the functional result and speed of rehabilitation between two types of hip prostheses: primary ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement versus metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 400
Inclusion Criteria
- Total hip replacement
Exclusion Criteria
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Functional result Speed of rehabilitation
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What are the molecular mechanisms underlying ceramic-on-cerotic wear in total hip arthroplasty?
How does metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compare to ceramic-on-ceramic in terms of long-term functional outcomes for young patients?
Which biomarkers correlate with successful rehabilitation after total hip replacement using ceramic prostheses?
What adverse events are associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in active individuals under 60 years old?
Are there alternative bearing surfaces to ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-metal for hip arthroplasty in osteoarthritis patients?
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University Hospital Ghent
🇧🇪Ghent, Belgium
University Hospital Ghent🇧🇪Ghent, Belgium