NCT00771407
Completed
Phase 4
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Third-party Blinded Study of Strattice Fascial Inlay for Parastomal Reinforcement in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Permanent Abdominal Wall Ostomies
ConditionsParastomal Hernia
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Parastomal Hernia
- Sponsor
- LifeCell
- Enrollment
- 120
- Locations
- 23
- Primary Endpoint
- Occurrence of Parastomal Hernia in Subjects Undergoing Permanent Abdominal Wall Ostomy Creation With and Without Strattice Fascial Inlay.
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 10 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for a permanent abdominal wall ostomy with and without placement of Strattice fascial inlay, as measured by postoperative occurence of parastomal hernia.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •need for permanent ileostomy or colostomy
Exclusion Criteria
- •history of hernia at new ostomy site
- •has previously implanted surgical mesh at site of planned ostomy
- •requires a temporary ostomy
- •has need for multiple ostomies
- •is receiving chronic immunosuppression therapy, has MELD score of \> 17, has severe COPD, systemic infection, or known collagen disorder
- •is bedridden or otherwise non-ambulatory
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Occurrence of Parastomal Hernia in Subjects Undergoing Permanent Abdominal Wall Ostomy Creation With and Without Strattice Fascial Inlay.
Time Frame: 24 months
Secondary Outcomes
- Stoma Complications(more than 1 month postoperatively)
- Stoma Quality of Life(Serially over 24 months)
Study Sites (23)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Study Comparing SBS and LRTI for Treatment of CMC ArthritisArthritisNCT05111405Fraser Orthopaedic Research Society138
Unknown
Phase 3
Different Surgical Approaches in Patients of Early-stage Cervical CancerUterine Cervical NeoplasmLaparotomyLaparoscopySurvivalMortalityMorbidityQuality of LifePelvic Floor DisordersCost-Benefit AnalysisNCT03739944Lei Li700
Withdrawn
Not Applicable
Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Scapula FracturesScapula FractureClavicle FractureNCT00849771Vanderbilt University
Completed
Not Applicable
Effectiveness Between Two Surgical Techniques for Reconstruction of Humeral Proximal Extremity FracturesA02.835.232.087.090.400.400NCT02075476Carlos Alvarez40
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Silicone Oil Tamponade for Vitrectomy of Hypermyopic Foveoschisis.Hypermyopic FoveoschisisNCT05628909Peking University People's Hospital159