MedPath

Comparison of Multi-point Pacing and Conventional CRT Through Non-invasive Hemodynamics Measurement and Global Longitudinal Strain Assessment

Completed
Conditions
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Interventions
Device: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy device programming
Registration Number
NCT04299360
Lead Sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Mater Domini, Catanzaro
Brief Summary

Pilot, perspective, multi-center non-randomized study comparing Multi-point pacing and conventional CRT through non-invasive hemodynamics measurement and Global Longitudinal Strain assessment

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
52
Inclusion Criteria
  • Recent or scheduled implantation of CRT-D system with quadripolar lead and MPP technology in patient with indications to CRT according to current guidelines
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients in Atrial Tachycardia (AT) or Atrial Fibrillation (AF) at the time of the enrollment or with persistent or long-standing persistent/chronic AF
  • NYHA IV patients
  • Right Bundle Branch Block

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
MPP BIVCardiac Resynchronization Therapy device programmingSuch modality of left ventricular stimulation requires a dynamic use of the four electrodes located in the proximal segment of the electrocatheter that allows the recruitment of a vast area of the left ventricle. It is limited by the presence of scars on left ventricle surface, or phrenic nerve inadvertent stimulation.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Acute improvement in cardiac function (1)24-48 hours after CRT-D implantation

change in dP/dtmax, expressed in mmHg/s, assessed through photoplethysmography. This assessment represents in a non-invasive fashion, the rise in pressure (P) developed inside left ventricle during contraction over time.

Acute improvement in cardiac function (2)24-48 hours after CRT-D implantation

change in global longitudinal strain, assessed through echocardiography. This assessment elucidates longitudinal shortening of the left ventricle as a percentage (change in length as a proportion to baseline length). GLS is derived from speckle tracking, and analyzed by post-processing of apical images of the left ventricle.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Delayed response (1)3 Months

change in GLS. Participants will investigate whether left ventricular remodeling upon "patient-tailored" biventricular stimulation will behave differentially according to type of stimulation; the total amount of CRT-responder patients will be therefore considered

Delayed response (2)3 Months

change in NYHA class. Participants will check if functional status will change after optimized biventricular stimulation therapy and will provide clinical data on CRT responders.

Trial Locations

Locations (3)

AO Cardarelli

🇮🇹

Napoli, Italy

AOU Federico II

🇮🇹

Napoli, Italy

Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Mater Domini

🇮🇹

Catanzaro, CZ, Italy

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath