CTRI/2023/09/057204Not yet recruitingUnknown
Comparison of conventional blind method and rotational manoeuvre of nasogastric tube insertion in anaesthetised intubated patients - A randomised controlled trial
Kauvery hospitals0 sites0 target enrollmentStarted: TBDLast updated:
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Unknown
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Posted for surgery under general anaesthesia and requires nasogastric tube insertion.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Altered coagulation parameters, not willing to participate in study, base of skull fractures and facial bone fractures, growth in pharynx or oesophagus
Investigators
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of Blind technique with under Vision technique of placement of airway tubes(LMA) in children.CTRI/2019/02/017644nil75
Completed
Not Applicable
Impact of the traditional blind technique versus the novel ultrasound guided technique for office fitting of intra-uterine contraceptive devices on success of insertion, time required and patient satisfaction in healthy women with regular menstrual periodsFertility controlReproductive Health and Childbirth - ContraceptionACTRN12615000526572Mervat Sheikhelarab Elsedeek100
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of conventional rotating method and non-rotating method for double-lumen tube insertion for one lung ventilation: A Randomized Clinical TrialDiseases of the respiratory systemKCT0005188Chungnam National University Hospital90
Completed
Not Applicable
The effect of four different blind techniques of i-gel insertion on device position and performance in pediatric patientsCTRI/2020/09/027606Priya Priyadarshi132
Not yet recruiting
Phase 1
comparison of two techniques of BASKA mask ,straight versus rotationalCTRI/2019/05/018922A