跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2023/08/056848
CTRI/2023/08/056848尚未招募不适用

Comparative study of the efficacy of Volume control ventilation vs Pressure control ventilation on patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries under general anaesthesia.

Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 82 人开始时间: 2023年9月25日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
82
试验地点
1
主要终点
To conclude if volume control ventilation or pressure control ventilation is effective in laparoscopic surgeries which has less hemodynamic responses

研究概览

简要总结

A variety of disorders are surgically treated with laparoscopy.Its benefits are frequently considered as being less intrusive, giving superiorcosmetic outcomes, and needing a shorter hospital stay because they are basedon surgical knowledge and cutting-edge technology.However, doing laparoscopicsurgery under general anaesthesia and pneumoperitoneum may result in adversepulmonary physiological alterations. This study will make it feasible to choosebetween volume control ventilation and pressure control ventilation forpatients having sedated laparoscopic procedures.After assigning the mode of ventilation 41 in each group the responses under general anaesthesia will be assessed namely the ventilatory and hemodynamic responses.Then comparison will be made for efficacy of pressure control or volume control ventilation and which has better patient outcome.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Not Applicable
盲法
Not Applicable

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 70.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Patients of any gender, ages 18 to
  • Patients in ASA Classes I and II.
  • All patients who are willing to provide written, fully informed permission.
  • The surgery duration between 60 and 120 minutes.

排除标准

  • ASA Class III and higher Patients rejection Male or female below the ages of 18 and above
  • Patients who shouldnt have laparoscopic procedures People who experience allergic responses to anaesthetic agents.

结局指标

主要结局

To conclude if volume control ventilation or pressure control ventilation is effective in laparoscopic surgeries which has less hemodynamic responses

时间窗: Pre induction | Induction | 5 minutes | 10 minutes | 15 minutes | 20 minutes | 25 minutes | 30 minutes | 35 minutes | 40 minutes | 45 minutes

次要结局

  • comparison of hemodynamic parameters(Pre induction)

研究者

申办方类型
Private medical college

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Comparing two different types of ventilation for... | 临床试验