MedPath

Analyze Changes in Respiratory Rate When Using the Scare Respirator

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Preterm Labor
Apnea of Newborn
Interventions
Device: No intervention
Device: scare ventilator at 20
Device: scare ventilator at 40
Registration Number
NCT04584814
Lead Sponsor
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Brief Summary

Pilot study of 10 preterm, who are going to be randomly placed to 3 phases : 2 hour of basal observation of respiratory rate, heart rate, saturation, NIPS and aEEG recording, 2 hours with a 20cycles/minute with "scare ventilator", and 2 hours of 40 cycles/minute with "scare ventilator"

Detailed Description

With this pilot study the investigator's want to see if the "scare respirator" can modify the vital signs of the newborn (NB) and if there is a relationship according to the frequency per minute given by the scare respirator and the patient's respiratory rate.

The "scare respirator" has been used many times to prevent central apnea in the newborn. This involves using a mechanical ventilator, but instead of connecting it to the patient's trachea to inflate his lungs, the air flow is connected to a surgical glove that inflates and deflates, with the optimal respiratory rate that the patient should have. This will be placed on the back to stimulate it tactically giving the necessary impulse of inspiration so that the patient alone can acquire the movement.

The importance of the development of this study is that it has been seen that the "scare respirator" could avoid central apneas, but no studies have been done on the change in respiratory rate that occurs with the device or if it bothers the NB or alters its wakefulness sleep pattern.

It is intended to evaluate 10 premature infants, during 3 observation periods. Heart rate (HR), Respiratory rate (RR) and saturation, pain scale and aEEG sleep wake pattern will be evaluated; first a rest period between feeds as baseline, then with a scare respirator at 20 cycles per minute and finally at 40 cycles per minute. The differences of qualitative and quantitative variables will be assessed with ad-hoc statistical tests.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
10
Inclusion Criteria
  • hospitalized healthy preterm babies,
  • weighing more than 1500g at the time of the study
Exclusion Criteria
  • babies receiving any respiratory support
  • carrier of any mayor malformation or genetic condition

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SEQUENTIAL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Babies born Pretermscare ventilator at 40Preterm babies, healthy at the time of the study, free of neonatal diseases and/or sequelae or malformations or genetic diseases. They were random assigned to two-hours blocks of basal, and dorsal stimulation protocol at 20 or 40 times per minute, each.
Babies born Pretermscare ventilator at 20Preterm babies, healthy at the time of the study, free of neonatal diseases and/or sequelae or malformations or genetic diseases. They were random assigned to two-hours blocks of basal, and dorsal stimulation protocol at 20 or 40 times per minute, each.
Babies born PretermNo interventionPreterm babies, healthy at the time of the study, free of neonatal diseases and/or sequelae or malformations or genetic diseases. They were random assigned to two-hours blocks of basal, and dorsal stimulation protocol at 20 or 40 times per minute, each.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change of respiratory Synchronicity with the scare ventilator between 20 and 40 cycles per minute (cpm)ten minutes after each intervention starts and every ten minutes for 2 hours straight

% of time were respiratory rate is synchronised with the scare ventilator input, two tales of statistical differences, at 20 and 40 cycles per minute (cpm)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from baseline on RR using the scare ventilator at 40 cpmpre-intervention, ten minutes after intervention starts every ten minutes for 2 hours straight

differences in RR mean with two tales of statistical differences between the two periods

Change from baseline newborn HR using the scare ventilator at 40 cpmpre-intervention, ten minutes after intervention starts and every ten minutes for 2 hours straight

differences in HR mean with two tales of statistical analysis ,between the two study periods

Change from baseline on Sleep-wake cycles (SWC) using the scare ventilator at 20 cpmpre-intervention, ten minutes after intervention starts and every ten minutes for 2 hours straight

% of time of aEEG SWC presence, two tales of statistical differences, between the 2 study periods

Change from baseline on Discomfort scale using the scare ventilator at 20 cpmpre-intervention, ten minutes after intervention starts every ten minutes for 2 hours straight

Differences with the NIPS average, two tales of statistical differences, between the two study periods (scale 0-12; 0-2 no pain, 3-4 moderate pain, 5 or more severe pain)

Change from baseline on Discomfort scale using the scare ventilator at 40 cpmpre-intervention, ten minutes after intervention starts every ten minutes for 2 hours straight

Differences with the NIPS average, two tales of statistical differences, between the two study periods (scale 0-12; 0-2 no pain, 3-4 moderate pain, 5 or more severe pain)

Change from baseline newborn HR using the scare ventilator at 20 cpmpre-intervention, ten minutes after intervention starts and every ten minutes for 2 hours straight

differences in HR mean with two tales of statistical analysis ,between the two study periods

Change from baseline on Sleep-wake cycles (SWC) using the scare ventilator at 40 cpmpre-intervention, ten minutes after intervention starts and every ten minutes for 2 hours straight

% of time of aEEG SWC presence, two tales of statistical differences, between the 2 study periods

Change from baseline on RR using the scare ventilator at 20 cpmpre-intervention, ten minutes after intervention starts every ten minutes for 2 hours straight

differences in RR mean with two tales of statistical differences between the two periods

Change from baseline on oxygen saturation using the scare ventilator at 40 cpmpre-intervention, ten minutes after intervention starts every ten minutes for 2 hours straight

differences in mean oxygen saturation expressed as a % , with two tales of statistical differences between the two periods

Change from baseline on oxygen saturation using the scare ventilator at 20 cpmpre-intervention, ten minutes after intervention starts every ten minutes for 2 hours straight

differences in mean oxygen saturation expressed as a % , with two tales of statistical differences between the two periods

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Puc, Nicu

🇨🇱

Santiago, Area Metropolitana, Chile

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath