MedPath

Dose efficacy relation of inhalative prostaglandin I2 vs. inhalative prostaglandin E1 in patients with ARDS: comparison of efficacy with respect to paO2/FiO2 ratio, Qs/Qt and PAP.

Phase 1
Conditions
Patients suffering from ARDS who need in the moment of enrolment artificial respiration
Registration Number
EUCTR2004-001529-88-AT
Lead Sponsor
Medical University of Vienna
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ot Recruiting
Sex
Not specified
Target Recruitment
10
Inclusion Criteria

ARDS according to definition on American European Consensus Conference on ARDS
Mandatory artificial respiration
ARDS duration < 72 hours
Male, female patients aged 18 to 80 years
No cardiac genesis (cardiac echo or PCWP)

Are the trial subjects under 18? no
Number of subjects for this age range:
F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes
F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range
F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes
F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion Criteria

Pregnancy
Haemorrhagic diathesis
Cranial / Brain injuries
Severe renal and hepatic diseases

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional clinical trial of medicinal product
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
<br> Main Objective: Main objective : maximum difference of the PaO2/FiO2 ratio between start of therapy and onset of the maximum effect of the inhaled PGI2 respectively PGE1<br><br> ;<br> Secondary Objective: Secondary objectives : Dosage effect relation of both substances for ABP (arterial blood pressure), PAP (pulmonary arterial pressure), CO (cardiac output) and PG (prostaglandine) degradation products. Change of these parameters for each dosage with respect to the initial value.<br> ;Primary end point(s): Maximum difference of the PaO2/FiO2 ratio between start of therapy and onset of the maximum effect of the inhaled PGI2 respectively PGE1
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath