Impact of Weight Loss on Physical Function
- Conditions
- Obesity
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Moderate intensity weight lossBehavioral: High intensity medical weight loss
- Registration Number
- NCT02079051
- Lead Sponsor
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences
- Brief Summary
We are proposing a trial to directly compare a high intensity weight loss protocol to a moderate intensity weight loss protocol to determine which leads to greater improvements in physical function in severely obese older adults.
- Detailed Description
We are proposing a trial to directly compare a high intensity weight loss protocol to a moderate intensity weight loss protocol to determine which leads to greater improvements in physical function in severely obese older adults. We are also interested in comparing the safety of the two approaches. If we can demonstrate effective weight reduction that happens with sufficient expediency and impact to improve physical functioning without increasing adverse events in severely obese older adults, a sizable percentage of the population would benefit and there would be significant reductions in disability resulting in cost savings for the healthcare system.
This application specifically addresses objective 3 as detailed in the announcement of this pilot funding mechanism (Objective 3. To develop and reliably test in clinical or pre-clinical studies novel interventions which target adiposity, peripheral or central nervous system, vascular, body composition and/or musculoskeletal related factors for preventing the age-related decline in physical function and preventing or reversing the progression to disability). This application describes a pilot randomized, controlled trial designed to address the following aims:
* Assess efficacy and safety of high intensity medical weight management in severely obese (= stage II BMI) older adults for functional outcomes (i.e., functional weight loss) compared to a moderate intensity weight loss intervention.
* Determine if a potential dose response relationship exists between weight loss volume (primarily as excess fat) and improvements in several measures of physical function.
* Identify changes in body composition (fat and lean including bone) that are associated with changes in physical function.
* Identify biomarkers (specific focus on markers of inflammation) that provide potential mechanistic links between weight reduction and changes in physical function in severely obese older adults.
Our primary hypothesis is that there is a greater improvement in physical function with a high intensity weight loss intervention compared to a moderate intensity intervention.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 28
- At least 65 years old at the time of the initial screening visit
- BMI greater than or equal to 35 kg/m2
- Cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment < 20)
- Depression (Centers for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale score >16
- Recent weight change (+/- 10 lbs. in the last 12 months)
- History of non-skin cancer in the last 2 years
- Cardiovascular disease event or unstable angina within the past six months, severe pulmonary disease, renal failure
- Major liver dysfunction within the last 2 years
- Recently quit smoking less than 12 months prior
- Use of estrogen or testosterone replacement therapy
- Current use of medications for psychosis or manic-depressive illness
- Use of weight-loss medications in previous 3 months
- Dependence on others for food procurement or preparation
- Poorly controlled diabetes (HgA1c greater than or equal to 9%) or blood pressure (greater than or equal to 159 mm Hg systolic or 99 mm Hg diastolic)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Moderate Intensity Weight Loss Moderate intensity weight loss Moderate intensity weight loss High Intensity Weight Loss High intensity medical weight loss High intensity medical weight loss
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) 6 months It is a measure of lower-extremity function consisting of walking speed, balance, and repeated chair stands. These 3 performance measures are scored from 0 to 4, with 4 indicating the highest level of performance and 0 the inability to complete the task. The summary score ranges from 0 (worst) to 12 (best). The SPPB is a well-studied composite measure and a strong predictor of disability, institutionalization, morbidity and mortality in initially non-disabled older persons. The reliability of the individual components, as well as the summary score, are good, with intra-class correlation coefficients above 0.88, and the measure is sensitive to change. Even small changes of 0.5-0.6 points have been shown to be clinically meaningful. Importantly, it has recently been advocated as an important primary outcome to be used in RCTs designed to develop evidenced-based interventions to prevent or postpone functional decline.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Wake Forest Baptist Health
🇺🇸Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States