Comparison of Two Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Systems
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Obstructive Sleep Apnoea
- Interventions
- Device: Novel SystemDevice: Traditional System
- Registration Number
- NCT02535234
- Lead Sponsor
- ResMed
- Brief Summary
Randomised crossover trial of a novel and traditional Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) system in Obstructive Sleep Apnoea patients.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Arm 1 Novel System Participants randomised to Arm 1 will receive an intervention of 7 nights with the Novel system followed by 7 nights with theTraditional system Arm 2 Novel System Participants randomised to Arm 1 will receive an intervention of 7 nights with the Traditional system followed by 7 nights with the Novel system Arm 1 Traditional System Participants randomised to Arm 1 will receive an intervention of 7 nights with the Novel system followed by 7 nights with theTraditional system Arm 2 Traditional System Participants randomised to Arm 1 will receive an intervention of 7 nights with the Traditional system followed by 7 nights with the Novel system
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Subjective usability ratings of the prototype system using a visual analogue scale, compared to a reference level and the second full system. 1 year Participants will be asked to complete a short questionnaire at the end of each week to evaluate the general usability of the system. The questionnaire will include questions related to system use and comfort. The participants will answer the questions using an 11-point Likert scale.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
ResMed
🇦🇺Sydney, New South Wales, Australia