Comparison of the Subjective and Objective Performance of a Novel Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) System With a Traditional Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) System.

ResMed1 个研究点分布在 1 个国家目标入组 30 人2016年4月

适应症Obstructive Sleep Apnoea

概览

阶段: 不适用
干预措施: 未指定
疾病 / 适应症: Obstructive Sleep Apnoea
发起方: ResMed
入组人数: 30
试验地点: 1
主要终点: Subjective usability ratings of the prototype system using a visual analogue scale, compared to a reference level and the second full system.
状态: 已完成
最后更新: 5年前

概览研究者入排标准结局指标研究点相似试验

概览

简要总结

Randomised crossover trial of a novel and traditional Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) system in Obstructive Sleep Apnoea patients.

注册库

clinicaltrials.gov

开始日期

2016年4月

结束日期

2016年6月

最后更新

5年前

研究类型

Interventional

研究设计

Crossover

性别

All

研究者

发起方

ResMed

责任方

Sponsor

入排标准

入选标准

未提供

排除标准

未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Subjective usability ratings of the prototype system using a visual analogue scale, compared to a reference level and the second full system.

时间窗: 1 year

Participants will be asked to complete a short questionnaire at the end of each week to evaluate the general usability of the system. The questionnaire will include questions related to system use and comfort. The participants will answer the questions using an 11-point Likert scale.