Relative Patient Benefits of a Hospital-PCMH Collaboration Within an ACO to Improve Care Transitions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Enrollment
- 1,679
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Proportion of Participants With an Adverse Event Within 30 Days After Index Discharge Date
Study Overview
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to design and implement a set of procedures (the intervention) to improve patients' experiences when they are discharged home from the hospital. Second, this study aims to look at how the intervention affects problems that are known to occur after discharge, including medication issues, worsening medical problems, or readmission to the hospital. The investigators will study how well patients recover the ability to do the things they could before they were admitted to the hospital and their opinions of the discharge process. Lastly, this study will look to understand the best way to implement the intervention into different hospitals and practices, and which types of patients benefit from it most.
Detailed Description
The specific aims of this study are:
- To develop, implement, and refine a multi-faceted, multi-disciplinary transitions intervention with contributions from hospital and Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) personnel.
Hypothesis: a collaborative transitions intervention can be designed and implemented within an ACO that reliably provides the components of an ideal transition in care. 2. To evaluate the effects of this intervention on post-discharge adverse events, functional status, patient engagement, and emergency department and hospital utilization within 30 days of discharge.
Hypothesis: compared with usual care, a collaborative transitions intervention will decrease post discharge adverse events, improve post-discharge functional status, increase patient engagement, and reduce emergency department and hospital utilization in the post-discharge period. 3. To understand barriers to and facilitators of successful implementation of this intervention across practices.
Hypothesis
several barriers to and facilitators of implementation can be identified and used to create lessons learned for other health systems to successfully implement this type of intervention.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Sequential
- Primary Purpose
- Other
- Masking
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Potential subjects will be adult patients admitted to medical and surgical services at BWH and MGH, likely to be discharged back to the community, and whose PCP belongs to one of the Partners Community Healthcare, Inc. (PCHI) primary care practices that has met "Primed" criteria for being a PCMH, admits at least 2 patients to BWH or MGH, and has agreed to participate. Primed criteria are a standard set of requirements that cover 6 essential building blocks of PCMH practices: electronic health record, patient portal, team-based care, practice redesign, care management, and identification of high-risk patients. We estimate that of the approximately 300 PCHI adult primary care practices, 150 of them will meet PCMH criteria during the study and that 20 of them will qualify and be willing to participate in the study. We estimate that 12,000 such patients will be admitted to BWH and MGH over the 18-month study period, of which we will enroll 1700 patients. These patients are broadly representative of hospitalized patients and include several vulnerable populations, including the elderly (33% 65 or older), patients with multiple chronic conditions (47% with Elixhauser comorbidity score 5 or more), and racial and ethnic minorities (14% African American, 13% Latino).
Exclusion Criteria
- •Likely discharge to a location other than home (or to a caregiver's home)
- •Police custody
- •No telephone or homeless
- •Previous enrolment in the study
- •Patient unable to communicate in either English or Spanish
Arms & Interventions
Multi-Model Intensive Discharge Program
Multi-Model Intensive Discharge Program
Intervention: Multi-Model Intensive Discharge Intervention (Other)
Usual Care
Usual Care
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Proportion of Participants With an Adverse Event Within 30 Days After Index Discharge Date
Time Frame: 30 days after discharge
Proportion of Participants With an Adverse Event Within 30 Days after Index Discharge Date
Secondary Outcomes
- Proportion of Participants With New or Worsening Signs/Symptoms Within 30 Days of Discharge(30 days after discharge)
- Number of Patients With a Nonelective Readmission Within 30 Days of the Index Discharge Date(30 days after discharge)
- Proportion of Participants With Positive Responses Regarding Patient Engagement and Opinions of the Discharge Process(30 days after discharge)
- Post-Discharge Health Care Utilization(30 days after discharge)
- Change in Functional Status on the Modified Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-12 (SF-12v2) From One Month Prior to Admission to 30 Days After Discharge.(One month prior to admission to 30 days after discharge.)
Investigators
Jeffrey L. Schnipper, MD.,MPH.
Associate Professor of Medicine
Brigham and Women's Hospital