MedPath

Reliability, Validity and Clinical Utility of a Robotic Assessment for Proprioception

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Multiple Sclerosis
Neurological Diseases or Conditions
Sensory Disorders
Stroke
Interventions
Other: Robotic assessment of finger proprioception
Registration Number
NCT03619642
Lead Sponsor
Hasselt University
Brief Summary

The aim of this case-controlled observational cross-sectional study is to investigate the test-retest reliability, validity and clinical utility of a rapid robotic assessment of finger proprioception using a passive gauge position matching tasks in MS and stroke subjects.

Session 1 Informed consent Descriptive measures Session 2 Clinical testing Robotic assessment (3x) Session 3 Clinical testing Robotic assessment (3x)

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
50
Inclusion Criteria

Inclusion criteria MS subjects

  • Age > 18 years
  • Diagnosis of MS (McDonald criteria)
  • No relapse or relapse-related treatment within the last 3 months prior to the study

Inclusion criteria Stroke subjects

  • Age > 18 years
  • Diagnosis of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic),
  • Between 2 weeks and 12 months post-stroke
Exclusion Criteria
  • Complete paralysis of both upper limbs
  • Unable to detect any passive movement in hand and fingers
  • Unable to place the hand in the robotic devices without any discomfort or pain
  • Marked or severe intention tremor (Fahn's tremor rating scale on finger-to-nose test > 3)
  • Marked or severe spasticity for finger and elbow flexors or shoulder adductors (Modified Asworth scale >3)
  • Other medical conditions interfering with the hand function (peripheral nerve lesion, orthopedic or rheumatoid impairment, pain, edema)
  • Severe cognitive or visual deficits interfering with testing and training (e.g. Aphasia, neglect, ...)

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
stroke patientsRobotic assessment of finger proprioception25 stroke patients Persons are tested on proprioception of the interphalangeal joints of teh fingers by means of a robotic device.
healthy controlsRobotic assessment of finger proprioception50 healthy controls Persons are tested on proprioception of the interphalangeal joints of teh fingers by means of a robotic device.
persons with Multiple Sclerosis (MS)Robotic assessment of finger proprioception25 persons with MS Persons are tested on proprioception of the interphalangeal joints of teh fingers by means of a robotic device.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Errorday 3

The extracted parameter is measured by the robotic device. The MCP angular position measured by the robot and the angle reported on the touchscreen by the subject.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Semmens-Weinstein monofilamentsday 3

Tactile sensitivity in the fingers (Semmens-Weinstein monofilaments)

sexday 1

man/female

Ageday 1

age

medication useday 1

medication use at time of study

the modified Ashworth scaleday 1

Spasticity of the upper limb will be evaluated with the modified Ashworth scale

Edinburgh Handedness Inventoryday 1

Hand Dominance evaluated with Edinburgh Handedness Inventory

Nine Hole Peg testday 1

manual dexterity test

Box and block testday 1

gross and fine upper limb test

Manual Ability Measure-36 (questionnaire)day 1

Patient reported measure for upper limb use in daily life activities

Symbol digit modalities testday 1

Cognitive function (Symbol digit modalities test)

25 foot walk testday 1

Gait velocity test

Rydel Seiffer Tuning forkday 3

Vibration in the upper limb (Rydel Seiffer Tuning fork)

The Erasmus MC modification of the Nottingham Sensory Assessment (EmNSA)day 3

Sensory function test

The System Usability Scale (SUS)day 3

questionnaire

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Jessa Ziekenhuis

🇧🇪

Hasselt, Belgium

Revalidatie & MS Centrum Overpelt

🇧🇪

Overpelt, Belgium

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath