Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04931472
NCT04931472CompletedNot Applicable

Feasibility and Acceptability of the Clinical Frailty Scale in a Swedish Emergency Department Setting

University Hospital, Linkoeping1 site in 1 country229 target enrollmentStarted: June 8, 2021Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
229
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Completion rate

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS).

The scale can potentially be adopted for daily use in the Emergency Department (ED) and have been evaluated with regard to feasibility to a certain extent, but have so far not been evaluated in the Swedish emergency care context.

Detailed Description

The CFS is introduced and tested as part of a quality-improvement process regarding elderly people within the three Emergency departments (ED) of Region Östergötland.

CFS is a 9-point scale developed within the Canadian Study of Health and Aging, a pictograph and a clinical description aids to assign scores from very fit to terminally ill. The scale enable clinicians to stratify elderly people's degree of frailty with the help of questions and clinical assessment. However, even excellent tools will not be used if they are too difficult or time consuming. The amount of papers addressing issues regarding feasibility and acceptability of the CFS in a clinical ED-setting is still limited, and for Swedish EDs non-existent.

This study is part of a larger research project, data will be collected in three ways:

A. All eligible patients who visit the ED for a period of six weeks will be enrolled, and subsequently assessed with CFS by one of their responsible health-care professionals (i.e. physician, registered nurse or nurse assistant). The number of screened patients divided by the total number of eligible patients will yield the screening rate. Patient- and organisational related characteristics will be collected from the electronic health record.

B. 100 patients will be assessed when someone from the research team is present to enrol patients and clock the assessments. These work shifts will be selected using the online application Research Randomizer, to randomly include all hours of the day as well as eligible health-care professionals. The research-team member will document the time to complete the assessment using CFS, which will give us the screening time.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Cohort
Time Perspective
Prospective

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Has been in clinical work at the ED for the period of the current study

Exclusion Criteria

  • Unwilling to provide informed consent

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Completion rate

Time Frame: During a period of six weeks

Proportion of completed Clinical Frailty Scale assessments in relation to the number of eligible patients

Secondary Outcomes

  • Duration of time to make the assessment(The assessment will be made in connection with the patient´s first meeting with the care team, i.e. within 1 hour from the patient´s arrival to the ED)
  • Barriers to perform(Questionnaire that can be answered within five weeks)
  • Patient related characteristics correlated to completion rate(From admission to discharge from the Emergency department, up to 24 hours.)
  • Relevance(Questionnaire that can be answered within five weeks)
  • Organisational related characteristics correlated to completion rate(From admission to discharge from the Emergency department, up to 24 hours)
  • Facilitators to perform assessment(Questionnaire that can be answered within five weeks)
  • Ease of use(Questionnaire that can be answered within five weeks)

Investigators

Sponsor
University Hospital, Linkoeping
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Daniel Wilhelms

Principal Investigator

University Hospital, Linkoeping

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Feasibility and Acceptability of the... | Clinical Trial