KCT0009605
Not yet recruiting
未知
A Prospective, Comparative Study to investigate the Clinical Efficacy of iLUX and IPL treatment in Dry Eye Patients with Meibomian gland dysfunction
Overview
- Phase
- 未知
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Not specified
- Sponsor
- Asan Medical Center
- Enrollment
- 140
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •1\) Patients who visited Asan Medical Center between IRB approval date and March 30, 2025 (3 months prior to June 30, 2025\) and were diagnosed with dry eye syndrome with MGD and voluntarily agreed to participate in clinical trials.
- •2\) Mild to moderate dry eye syndrome with MGD is diagnosed by the following criteria.
- •i. symptoms of dry eye syndrome persist for at least 3 months before registration of clinical trial
- •ii. The TBUT is less than 10 seconds and meets at least one of the following three criteria
- •a. Meibomian gland secretion is reduced during eyelid compression, showing turbid, toothpaste\-like secretions, or viscous secretions.
- •b. Two or more telangiectasia at the edge of your eyelid
- •c. Two or more orifices for meibomian gland are blocked
- •3\) Age 19 years and older and under 85 years of any gender or race
- •4\) Ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score of 33 or lower (mild to moderate OSDI score)
Exclusion Criteria
- •1\) Sjogren’s disease
- •2\) all the orifices of the upper and lower meibomian glands are completely blocked and no secretion of meibum
- •3\) Subject with use of cyclosporine, steroids, or antibiotics (eye drops) within 2 weeks of the screening day.
- •4\) Subject with use of eye drops containing lipid within 2 weeks of the screening day.
- •5\) Wearing contact lenses within the six month of screening day.
- •6\) Ophthalmic surgery or trauma within the last 3 months of screening day.
- •7\) Subject planning eye surgery (including LASIK/LASEK) during the study period
- •8\) Pregnant women, lactating women and planning to pregnant women
- •9\) Allergic to fluorescein eye drops.
- •10\) Other things that are not suitable judged by an investigator
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
A prospective comparative study to determine whether an infrared imaging system can prevent bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection.JPRN-UMIN000006545Jikei University school of Medicine25
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparative study to evaluate the proteomic and metabolic profile of blood serum in cancer patients belonging to two different nutritional groupsHealth Condition 1: D498- Neoplasm of unspecified behavior of other specified sitesCTRI/2019/09/021015Tata Memorial Hospital
Completed
Not Applicable
Study to evaluate safety of BEST surgery in complex fistulaHealth Condition 1: K605- Anorectal fistulaCTRI/2022/04/041736Healing Hands Clinic50
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
A study to compare the patient reported outcomes with the use of oral dydrogesterone vs. micronized vaginal progesterone in high risk pregnanciesHealth Condition 1: O092- Supervision of pregnancy with other poor reproductive or obstetric historyCTRI/2022/11/047511Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparing one day of intravenous Amikacin to 3 days in preventing urinary infection in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the ProstateHealth Condition 1: null- Bladder outlet obstruction due to benign prostatic enlargementHealth Condition 2: N390- Urinary tract infection, site notspecifiedCTRI/2017/09/009721Fluid research fund CMC Vellore338