mHealth Usage Among Nigeria Women Diagnosed With Breast Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Breast Cancer
• Interventions: Other: mHealth psychoeducational intervention

• Registration Number: NCT05489354
• Lead Sponsor: Chinese University of Hong Kong

Brief Summary

The research is studying the effect of a mHealth psychoeducational intervention on self-efficacy, coping and psychological distress of Nigerian women diagnosed with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy

The study is a two-arm assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial which will be conducted in two University Teaching Hospitals in Nigeria.

Detailed Description

Aim The study aims to develop and implement a culturally adapted mHealth psychoeducational intervention (mPEI) for Nigerian women diagnosed with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.

Objectives

1. To evaluate the effectiveness of the programme on self-efficacy (primary outcome), coping, symptom distress, anxiety, depression, and quality of life (secondary outcomes) among women with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy

2. To explore the participants' experiences and feelings towards the intervention.

Hypothesis

It is hypothesised that participants who receive the mPEI program, when compared with the control group at baseline and immediately after the intervention, will demonstrate:

1. a significantly higher level of self-efficacy,

2. a significantly higher level of coping,

3. a significantly higher level of quality of life,

4. a significantly lower level of symptom distress,

5. a significantly lower level of anxiety and depression.

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2022-08-03
• Study First Submitted QC: 2022-08-03
• Study First Posted: 2022-08-05
• Study Start: 2022-09-01
• Primary Completion: 2023-03-30
• Study Completion: 2023-06-30
• Status Verified: 2023-07
• Last Update Submitted: 2023-07-28
• Last Update Posted: 2023-08-01

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: Female
• Target Recruitment: 126

Inclusion Criteria

Include females who are:

1. newly diagnosed with breast cancer within the recent three months
2. currently receiving chemotherapy,
3. have access to a smartphone and internet,
4. are able to read and write in English,
5. are cognitively capable of completing the questionnaires,
6. consent to join the study.

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

Include females:

1. with a concurrent physical or mental illness (as these might act as a confounder)
2. cognitively impaired

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
mHealth psychoeducational intervention	mHealth psychoeducational intervention	The intervention group will receive six weeks mHealth psychoeducational intervention (mPEI) delivered through a mobile application.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change in self-efficacy	Pre-intervention and immediately after the six weeks intervention	Self-efficacy for coping with cancer will be measured with the Cancer Behaviour Inventory-Brief Version (CBI-B). This is a 12-item instrument measuring confidence of individuals in performing activities that show how well they are coping with the demands of cancer and their treatment. Each item will be scored on a nine-point Likert scale with '1' meaning 'not at all confident' and '9' meaning 'totally confident'. The lowest score is 12 and the highest score is 108. Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy in coping.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change in Depression	Pre-intervention and immediately after the six weeks intervention	Depression will be assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). HADS comprises anxiety and depression subscales with seven items per subscale. A total score of 0-7 is normal, 8-10 is borderline abnormal and 11-21 is abnormal.
Change in Coping	Pre-intervention and immediately after the six weeks intervention	Coping will be assessed through Brief Cope Inventory. This is a 28-item self-report questionnaire designed to measure effective and ineffective ways to cope with a stressful life event. Respondents rate items on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 1- "I haven't been doing this at all" to 4- "I have been doing this a lot". There are 14 scales in the Brief Cope, with each measuring a specific coping strategy. Each of the 14 scales is comprised of 2 items; total scores on each scale range from 2 (minimum) to 8 (maximum). Higher scores indicate increased utilization of that specific coping strategy. Total scores on each of the scales are calculated by summing the appropriate items for each scale. No items are reverse scored. High scores are indicative of psychological strength, grit, a practical approach to problem-solving and is predictive of positive outcomes.
Change in Symptom Distress	Pre-intervention and immediately after the six weeks intervention	Symptom distress will be measured with the Monroe Dunaway (M. D.) Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) which comprises 13 items to measure symptom severity and six items to measure the rate of interference of the symptoms with patient's activities of daily living. The MDASI assesses the severity of symptoms at their worst in the last 24 hours on a 0-10 NRS, with 0 being "not present" and 10 being "as bad as you can imagine." For symptom severity, there are 13 items, the highest score is 130 and the lowest is 13. Higher scores indicate higher degree of symptom severity. For symptom interference, there are six items. The highest score is 60 and the lowest score is 6. Higher scores indicate higher degree of interference of symptoms with activities of daily living.
Change in Anxiety	Pre-intervention and immediately after the six weeks intervention	Anxiety will be assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). HADS comprises anxiety and depression subscales with seven items per subscale. A total score of 0-7 is normal, 8-10 is borderline abnormal and 11-21 is abnormal.
Change in Quality of Life	Pre-intervention and immediately after the six weeks intervention	Quality of life will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-B (FACT-B). This instrument contains 37-items for measuring five domains of health-related quality of life in BC patients on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score for the five domains ranges from 0-148 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Lagos State University Teaching Hospital; 🇳🇬 Lagos, Nigeria

Lagos University Teaching Hospital; 🇳🇬 Lagos, Nigeria