A Trial Of Oral Chloral Hydrate Versus Intranasal Dexmedetomidine For Sedated Abr Exams
Phase 4
Completed
- Conditions
- Sedation
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT01255904
- Lead Sponsor
- Baylor College of Medicine
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of oral chloral hydrate to intranasal dexmedetomidine for the successful completion of a sedated ABR exam (hearing exam).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 90
Inclusion Criteria
- Patient scheduled for ABR exam with sedation to be administered according to protocol by nurse in keeping with standard practice at the TCH Audiology clinic.
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients younger than 6 months or older than 8 years
- Previously failed sedation
- Weight greater than 25 kg
- Weight less than 5 kg
- BMI above 30
- Diagnosis of ADHD
- Any patient deemed inappropriate for nurse administered sedation
- Patients with any cardiac disease
- Obstructive sleep apnea
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Arm 1 Intranasal placebo Oral Chloral and intranasal placebo Arm 1 Chloral Hydrate Oral Chloral and intranasal placebo Arm 2 Oral placebo oral placebo and intranasal dexmedetomidine Arm 2 Dexmedetomidine oral placebo and intranasal dexmedetomidine
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time to Complete Study 60-180 minutes Time from medication administration to study completion.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Texas Childrens Hospital
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States