MedPath

A Trial Of Oral Chloral Hydrate Versus Intranasal Dexmedetomidine For Sedated Abr Exams

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Sedation
Interventions
Other: Intranasal placebo
Other: Oral placebo
Registration Number
NCT01255904
Lead Sponsor
Baylor College of Medicine
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of oral chloral hydrate to intranasal dexmedetomidine for the successful completion of a sedated ABR exam (hearing exam).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
90
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patient scheduled for ABR exam with sedation to be administered according to protocol by nurse in keeping with standard practice at the TCH Audiology clinic.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients younger than 6 months or older than 8 years
  • Previously failed sedation
  • Weight greater than 25 kg
  • Weight less than 5 kg
  • BMI above 30
  • Diagnosis of ADHD
  • Any patient deemed inappropriate for nurse administered sedation
  • Patients with any cardiac disease
  • Obstructive sleep apnea

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Arm 1Intranasal placeboOral Chloral and intranasal placebo
Arm 1Chloral HydrateOral Chloral and intranasal placebo
Arm 2Oral placebooral placebo and intranasal dexmedetomidine
Arm 2Dexmedetomidineoral placebo and intranasal dexmedetomidine
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time to Complete Study60-180 minutes

Time from medication administration to study completion.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Texas Childrens Hospital

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath