Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/NCT01632683
NCT01632683
Completed
Not Applicable

Comparative Effectiveness of the C-MAC D-blade to Glidescope Videolaryngoscope in the Predicted Difficult Airway

Oregon Health and Science University1 site in 1 country1,100 target enrollmentMay 2013
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
ConditionsDifficult Airway

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Difficult Airway
Sponsor
Oregon Health and Science University
Enrollment
1100
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Intubation Success Rate
Status
Completed
Last Updated
8 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSitesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

This study evaluates success rates of tracheal intubation (passing a breathing tube)for patients who may be more challenging to intubate while utilizing one of two devices that facilitate placement of the tube with video technology.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
May 2013
End Date
August 2014
Last Updated
8 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Michael Aziz

Associate Professor

Oregon Health and Science University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •adult 18 years of age
  • •Mallampati classification scale score of 3 or 4
  • •Neck circumference greater than 40cm for males, 38 cm for females
  • •mouth opening less than 3cm, but greater than 2cm

Exclusion Criteria

  • •prisoners
  • •history of easy intubation (success on first attempt with direct laryngoscopy)
  • •known unstable cervical spine injury
  • •emergency surgery
  • •nasal intubation route
  • •planned awake technique

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Intubation Success Rate

Time Frame: 1 week

Success rate is defined as a single blade insertion with successful tracheal tube placement confirmed by return of end-tidal carbon dioxide

Secondary Outcomes

  • Graded Score of Laryngeal View Achieved(1 week)
  • Number of Participants With Observed Complications(1 week)
  • Intubation Time(1 week)
  • Number of Particpants Requiring Adjuncts to Assist Intubation(1 week)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Completed
Not Applicable
McGrath vs. C-MAC Video Laryngoscopy Comparison in Endotracheal Tube InsertionIntubation; Difficult or Failed
NCT04936516Udayana University68
Terminated
Not Applicable
CMAC® Versus Airtraq® and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Difficult Tracheal Intubation.AirwayDifficult IntubationAirway Device
NCT01031940University College Hospital Galway15
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparing Ease of Endotracheal Intubation Using C Blade and D Blade of CMAC Videolaryngoscope in Patients Undergoing Elective Cervical Spine SurgeryCervical Spine Instability
NCT05561231King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai68
Completed
Phase 4
Intubation of Patients With an Unstable Cervical Spine Using the CMAC DeviceLaminectomy
NCT01113723Cedars-Sinai Medical Center140
Completed
Phase 4
Comparison of Storz C-MAC and D-MAC Orotracheal Intubation Systems in Morbidly Obese PatientsObesity
NCT01556061The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston50