Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04936516
NCT04936516
Completed
Not Applicable

Effectiveness Comparison Between McGrath and C-MAC Video Laryngoscope in Endotracheal Tube Insertion

Udayana University1 site in 1 country68 target enrollmentAugust 1, 2021

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Intubation; Difficult or Failed
Sponsor
Udayana University
Enrollment
68
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Intubation time
Status
Completed
Last Updated
4 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Tracheal intubation is commonly performed using a standard Macintosh blade, but recently there has been advanced technology using video laryngoscopy (VL).In this modern era, there are various types of available VL to make it easier for anesthesiologists to perform intubation, especially in patients with difficult airway anatomy.

Various studies showed different results regarding the effectiveness of both C-MAC® and McGrath®, by assessing the comparison of the effectiveness, valuable information will be obtained for further consideration by experts in choosing the best tools in the future.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 1, 2021
End Date
October 14, 2021
Last Updated
4 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Udayana University
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Christopher Ryalino, MD

Principal Investigator

Udayana University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Elective surgery patients without neck and face trauma
  • Undergo surgery requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation
  • Patients with physical status ASA I-III
  • Patients aged 18-65 years
  • Nutritional status (BMI \< 35 Kg/m2)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients refusal to be included in the study
  • Patients with cervical spine instability
  • Anatomical and structural abnormalities of the maxillary teeth
  • Thyromental distance \<6 cm and inter-incisor distance \<3.5 cm
  • History of difficult intubation
  • LEMON criteria ≥ 3

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Intubation time

Time Frame: From first intubation attempt until successful intubation, an average of one minute

Time required to perform intubation until endotracheal tube is properly positioned

Ease of intubation

Time Frame: From first intubation attempt until successful intubation, an average of two minutes

Difficulty level of intubation, scores 1-2, 1=effortless, 2=difficult

Secondary Outcomes

  • Glottic visualization(During first intubation attempt, an average of 30 seconds)
  • Complications of intubation(From first intubation attempt until successful intubation, an average of one minute)
  • Number of intubation attempts(From first intubation attempt until successful intubation, an average of one minute)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials