MedPath

Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine Infusion Treatment in Management of Neuropathic Pain

Phase 2
Conditions
Postherpetic Neuralgia
Diabetic Polyneuropathy
Peripheral Neuropathy
Interventions
Drug: Normal saline
Registration Number
NCT02597257
Lead Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital
Brief Summary

The investigators conducted a randomized, Double blind, and Controlled Study to evaluate the Efficacy and safety of Lidocaine Infusion Treatment in Management of Neuropathic pain.

Detailed Description

The investigators expect pain improvement after treatment with 3 mg/kg of lidocaine, continuously infused in normal saline 250 ml.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
44
Inclusion Criteria
  • postherpetic neuralgia, diabetic polyneuropathy, peripheral neuropathy
  • NRS score > 4
  • stable oral medication during the 1 month trial period
  • volunteers with informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
  • pregnancy, breastfeeding, possibility of pregnancy
  • pain from causes other than upper 3 indications
  • hypersensitivity to lidocaine or other local anesthetics
  • important disease of heart, kidney, liver or incurable disease that may affect the assessment of adverse effects, or may interfere with the completion of study
  • severe conduction block
  • history of other interventions that may affect the study
  • Enrollment in other clinical trials within 30 days
  • otherwise not suitable to study

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Normal SalineNormal saline* normal saline * total 250 ml * once a week * 4 times
Lidocaine HClLidocaine HCl* lidocaine 3 mg/kg mixed in normal saline * total 250 ml * once a week * 4 times
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
11-point Numeric Rating Scale1 week after the end of intervention

Rating averaged daily pain score over a 7-day period, 0=on pain to 10=worst possible pain

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Brief Pain Inventory Short Format the end of intervention and 4 weeks after the end of intervention

measurements of pain intensity, functionality, and impact of pain, rated on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) \[0=no pain to 10=worst possible pain\]

Shot Form McGill Pain Questionnaireat the end of intervention and 4 weeks after the end of intervention

15 pain descriptors ranked on a 4-stage intensity scale, the Present Pain Intensity index ranked on a 6-stage intensity and VAS (100-mm scale)

Patient Global Impression of Changeat the end of intervention and 4 weeks after the end of intervention

7-point scale from very much improved to very much worse

Number of patients with grade 3 through grade 5 adverse events that are related to study drug, graded according to NCI CTCAE version 4.0through the study completion (7 weeks)

AEs, laboratory values, vital signs, 12-lead ECG, finding from physical examination The intensity of AEs was graded according to the NCI common terminology criteria for adverse events v 4.0 on five point scale (grade 1 to 5: mild, moderate, severe, life-threatening and Death)

11-point Numeric Rating Scale4 weeks after the end of intervention

Rating averaged daily pain score over a 7-day period, 0=on pain to 10=worst possible pain

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Yong Chul Kim

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath