Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine Infusion Treatment in Management of Neuropathic Pain
- Conditions
- Postherpetic NeuralgiaDiabetic PolyneuropathyPeripheral Neuropathy
- Interventions
- Drug: Normal saline
- Registration Number
- NCT02597257
- Lead Sponsor
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Brief Summary
The investigators conducted a randomized, Double blind, and Controlled Study to evaluate the Efficacy and safety of Lidocaine Infusion Treatment in Management of Neuropathic pain.
- Detailed Description
The investigators expect pain improvement after treatment with 3 mg/kg of lidocaine, continuously infused in normal saline 250 ml.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 44
- postherpetic neuralgia, diabetic polyneuropathy, peripheral neuropathy
- NRS score > 4
- stable oral medication during the 1 month trial period
- volunteers with informed consent
- pregnancy, breastfeeding, possibility of pregnancy
- pain from causes other than upper 3 indications
- hypersensitivity to lidocaine or other local anesthetics
- important disease of heart, kidney, liver or incurable disease that may affect the assessment of adverse effects, or may interfere with the completion of study
- severe conduction block
- history of other interventions that may affect the study
- Enrollment in other clinical trials within 30 days
- otherwise not suitable to study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Normal Saline Normal saline * normal saline * total 250 ml * once a week * 4 times Lidocaine HCl Lidocaine HCl * lidocaine 3 mg/kg mixed in normal saline * total 250 ml * once a week * 4 times
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 11-point Numeric Rating Scale 1 week after the end of intervention Rating averaged daily pain score over a 7-day period, 0=on pain to 10=worst possible pain
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Brief Pain Inventory Short Form at the end of intervention and 4 weeks after the end of intervention measurements of pain intensity, functionality, and impact of pain, rated on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) \[0=no pain to 10=worst possible pain\]
Shot Form McGill Pain Questionnaire at the end of intervention and 4 weeks after the end of intervention 15 pain descriptors ranked on a 4-stage intensity scale, the Present Pain Intensity index ranked on a 6-stage intensity and VAS (100-mm scale)
Patient Global Impression of Change at the end of intervention and 4 weeks after the end of intervention 7-point scale from very much improved to very much worse
Number of patients with grade 3 through grade 5 adverse events that are related to study drug, graded according to NCI CTCAE version 4.0 through the study completion (7 weeks) AEs, laboratory values, vital signs, 12-lead ECG, finding from physical examination The intensity of AEs was graded according to the NCI common terminology criteria for adverse events v 4.0 on five point scale (grade 1 to 5: mild, moderate, severe, life-threatening and Death)
11-point Numeric Rating Scale 4 weeks after the end of intervention Rating averaged daily pain score over a 7-day period, 0=on pain to 10=worst possible pain
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Yong Chul Kim
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of