MedPath

Bispectral Index: A Comparison of Bifrontal Montage Agreement

Completed
Conditions
Surgery
Bispectral Index
Interventions
Device: BIS sensor
Registration Number
NCT04062240
Lead Sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Brief Summary

The researchers are trying to compare the results of two sensors when recorded simultaneously on opposite sides of the forehead.

Detailed Description

Bispectral Index (BIS) monitors are FDA approved to gauge depth of sedation by analyzing segments of electroencephalogram (EEG) waves. The BIS monitor utilizes a proprietary algorithm to process the EEG information second by second, and outputs a number (0-100) that corresponds with a patient's level of consciousness. A level of 0 indicates no EEG activity; a level of 100 indicates awake EEG activity. Several studies demonstrated that BIS monitors may not be useful in paralyzed patients, as patients who were paralyzed and not sedated unexpectedly showed a large decrease in their BIS values following administration paralytic medications. Vivien et al found BIS values dropped an average of 24 points in already sedated patients when the patients were given paralytics. In the same year, Messner and colleagues paralyzed non-sedated volunteers and found a dramatic drop in BIS values until paralysis wore off or was reversed. Schuller et al repeated the Messner experiment and found similar results with 18 of 20 non-sedated volunteer's BIS values dropping to levels expected of patients who were sedated. These results suggest that BIS monitors are integrating electromyography (EMG) data into its algorithm to derive a BIS value. Our hypothesis is that a BIS monitor commenced after paralysis, thereby lacking exposure to any "awake" EMG activity, will result in a cleaner data set and more accurate representation of a patient's level of sedation. Studying in this manner will require the subject to wear two BIS sensors in a frontal montage. The manufacturer of the sensors gives no guidance as to which side of the forehead an individual sensor is placed, and no studies demonstrate BIS validity with the use of concurrent sensors. The purpose of the present investigation is to assess the measurement difference and variability associated with use of concurrent bifrontal BIS sensors. The data obtained will be used as a framework for a future study related to the use of paralytics and BIS monitoring.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
15
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Adult patient having elective cardiac surgery
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Patient refusal.
  2. Pediatric patients.
  3. Emergency procedure.
  4. Patients with known or suspected carotid or cerebrovascular disease.
  5. Patients with prior stroke.
  6. Skin condition or anatomy preventing proper sensor placement.

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Additional BIS sensorBIS sensorMany providers caring for cardiovascular surgical patients utilizes BIS monitoring to gauge depth of anesthesia. The current practice involves placement of the BIS sensor on the patient's forehead per the manufacturer's recommendation on arrival to the operating room. The intervention in this study will add an additional BIS sensor to the patient's forehead. After syncing the two monitors for time, and ensuring appropriate skin contact and signal quality of both sensors, BIS monitoring will commence. BIS readings will be available every 12 seconds during the duration of the study, yielding up to 240 points of comparison per enrolled patient.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
BIS Montage10 minutes where both sensors are recording concurrently

Degree of variability between the values produced by the BIS sensors in a bifrontal montage when monitored simultaneously by use of a Bland-Altmann plot. The average value of each timed pair was plotted against the difference between the pairs.

The BIS monitor outputs data on a scale of 0-100 in arbitrary units; 0 = an isoelectric state on EEG, 100 = fully awake patient. BIS values of 40-60 are thought to reduce the chance of patient recall during general anesthesia.

For the purpose of this study, a smaller confidence interval is better as it indicates a higher level of agreement between the two BIS sensors.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Ketamine10 minutes where both sensors are recording concurrently

Degree to which Ketamine may influence BIS values

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Mayo Clinic

🇺🇸

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath