MedPath

RELIVE Informed Consent Study

Completed
Conditions
Living Donors
Tissue Donors
Interventions
Procedure: Organ Donation
Registration Number
NCT01742234
Lead Sponsor
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Brief Summary

An organ transplant is frequently the best option and, in some cases, the only option to save the lives of transplant recipients. Receiving an organ from a living donor eliminates the need to wait for a deceased donor, an option that many transplant recipients do not survive. However, donating an organ presents health concerns to the donor as well. This study will use surveys to evaluate the understanding of risk and psychological pressure that living organ donors felt when making the decision to donate. It will also compare participants' answers across geographic, racial and socio-economic backgrounds.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
624
Inclusion Criteria
  • Living donor of a kidney or lung
Exclusion Criteria
  • Unable to give informed consent

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Kidney DonorsOrgan DonationPeople who will donate a kidney at the University of Minnesota, Mayo Clinic, or University of Alabama
Lung DonorsOrgan DonationPeople who will donate a lung at the Washington University School of Medicine or the University of Southern California
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Questionnaire Score 3Change from 1 week prior to donation and 3 months after donation

Understanding of medical and psychosocial consequences of organ donation on a 4-point scale e.g.; "1: No understanding" to "4: Full understanding."

Questionnaire Score 1Change from 1 week prior to donation and 3 months after donation

Feelings of pressure to donate an organ on a 4-point scale e.g.; "1: No pressure" to "4: A lot of pressure."

Questionnaire Score 2Change from 1 week prior to donation and 3 months after donation

Understanding of the donor screening process on a 4-point scale e.g.; "1: No understanding" to "4: Full understanding."

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Questionnaire Score Secondary Endpoint 1Change from 1 week prior to donation and 3 months after donation

Understanding of short-term medical risks of donation answered on a 4-point scale e.g.; "1: No understanding" to "4: Full understanding."

Questionnaire Score Secondary Endpoint 3Change from 1 week prior to donation and 3 months after donation

Understanding of psychological risks of donation expressed by donors on a scale of 1 to 4 e.g.; "1: No understanding" to "4: Full understanding."

Questionnaire Score Secondary Endpoint 2Change from 1 week prior to donation and 3 months after donation

Understanding of long-term medical risks of donation expressed by donors on a scale of 1 to 4 e.g.; "1: No understanding" to "4: Full understanding."

Questionnaire Score Secondary Endpoint 4Change from 1 week prior to donation and 3 months after donation

Understanding that recipients may have variable outcomes as expressed by donors on a scale of 1 to 4 e.g.; "1: No understanding" to "4: Full understanding."

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath