MedPath

Virtual Reality in Teachers' Vocal Motor Behavior Acquisition (VirtuVox)

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Voice Disorders
Virtual Reality Therapy
Interventions
Behavioral: Direct Method
Behavioral: Indirect Method
Registration Number
NCT04096352
Lead Sponsor
University of Liege
Brief Summary

Scientific literature supports that teachers are at greater risk for voice disorders than the general population. In the classroom, the teacher's voice represents the main communication tool. Optimal voice use is indispensable to ensure effective teaching and preserve the teacher's vocal health.

This project investigates how virtual reality (VR) facilitates the learning of effective vocal skills and their application in real-world contexts. Based on acoustic analyses and self-assessment scales, the investigators compare 100 future teachers randomly assigned in two groups. The experimental group (n=50) receives a voice training by VR simulations and voice information. The control group (n=50) only receives voice information.

Detailed Description

Experimental group participants receive direct method (three 1-hour sessions of voice training by virtual reality simulations over a course of 3 weeks) and indirect method (one 1-hour session of information on voice function and voice hygiene). Control group participants receive indirect method (one 1-hour session of information on voice function and voice hygiene).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
41
Inclusion Criteria
  • future teacher having completed at least one internship as a schoolteacher
  • speaking French fluently
Exclusion Criteria
  • hearing impairment
  • voice pathology at the time of the study

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Indirect+Direct methodDirect MethodIndirect method: one session of information on voice function and voice hygiene. Direct method: three sessions of voice training using virtual reality simulations over a course of 3 weeks.
Indirect methodIndirect MethodIndirect method: one session of information on voice function and voice hygiene.
Indirect+Direct methodIndirect MethodIndirect method: one session of information on voice function and voice hygiene. Direct method: three sessions of voice training using virtual reality simulations over a course of 3 weeks.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Speech rate changes between the baseline and the end of the intervention3 weeks

Measurements of participants' speech rate (in syllables per second) when speaking with and without background noise.

Voice frequency changes between the baseline and the end of the intervention3 weeks

Acoustic measurements of participants' voice frequency (in hertz) when speaking with and without background noise.

Self-perceived voice changes between the baseline and the end of the intervention3 weeks

Self-assessment of perceived vocal effort using the Adapted BORG Category Ratio (CR-10) physical exertion scale. On the scale, verbal expressions regarding vocal effort are anchored to the correct positions on a logarithmic ratio scale from zero (No vocal effort at all) to 10 (Maximum vocal effort), according to their quantitative meaning.

Voice intensity changes between the baseline and the end of the intervention3 weeks

Acoustic measurements of participants' voice intensity (in dB) when speaking with and without background noise.

Voice spectrum changes between the baseline and the end of the intervention3 weeks

Acoustic measurements of participants' voice spectrum (in Hertz) when speaking with and without background noise.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Université de Liège

🇧🇪

Liège, Wallonia, Belgium

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath