MedPath

comparison between mfr and blr with plyometric training on hamstring

Phase 1/2
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
hamstring tightness
Registration Number
CTRI/2019/04/018712
Lead Sponsor
Radhika Sabu
Brief Summary

**Purpose**:

Purpose of this study was to examine the effect of hamstring flexibility and its parameter after self MFR and self BLR stretching on pre and post plyometric training session in beginner runners.

**Design:**

An Experimental study

**Objectives:**

To evaluate the effect of self MFR and self BLR stretching with plyometric training, on hamstring stiffness, endurance, strength and agility.

**Method:**

Sixty- four subjects aged between (18-25) were included in this study. Athletes were selected on the basis of inclusion criteria and they were divided randomly in to two groups, the Experimental group received self MFR for 6 weeks, per week three sessions along with plyometric training. And the Control group received self BLR for 6 weeks, per week 3 sessions. The outcome measures were rate of perceived exertion scale, Active knee extension test, agility T test, leg press test.

**Result:**

Paired t test and unpaired t test was used to analyse the data. It was found that there was no significant difference between pre and post hamstring stiffness, endurance, agility and strength in group A and group B. but group A was found more significant than group B.

**Conclusion:**

This study concluded that self Myofascial Release technique with plyometric training is better than self-Bent Leg Raise technique with plyometric training in beginner runners

**Key words:**

MFR, BLR, Plyometric training, Hamstring stiffness, Agility, Strength, Endurance.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
64
Inclusion Criteria

beginner runners, hamstring tightness.

Exclusion Criteria
  • 1)All medical conditions that are contraindicated for strength training exercises as per American College of Sports Medicine guidelines.
  • 2)Runners with lower extremity injuries.
  • 3)Any lower extremity reconstructive surgery in the past 2 years.
  • 4)Athletes who were taking and had previously taken growth hormone, or related performance endurance drugs.
  • 5)Medical or orthopaedic problems that compromised their participation in this study.

Study & Design

Study Type
PMS
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
flexibility,strength, endurance, agility2- before and after the study
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
gender distributions2- before and after the study

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

MGM SPORTS CLUB

🇮🇳

Aurangabad, MAHARASHTRA, India

MGM SPORTS CLUB
🇮🇳Aurangabad, MAHARASHTRA, India
Radhika Sabu
Principal investigator
8275676321
radhikasabu95@gmail.com

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.