Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05592639
NCT05592639Active, not recruitingNot Applicable

Videoendoscopic Radical Inguinal Lymphadenectomy Versus Open Radical Inguinal Lymphadenectomy in Patients With Penile Cancer: a Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial

University College, London1 site in 1 country50 target enrollmentStarted: June 23, 2022Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Active, not recruiting
Enrollment
50
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Ability to recruit patients

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Assess the feasibility of performing a RCT comparing videoendoscopic radical inguinal lymphadenectomy versus open radical inguinal lymphadenectomy in men diagnosed with genital cancer requiring inguinal lymphadenectomy, and determine the design of such an RCT.

Detailed Description

There is increasing interest in using videoendoscopic inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) as an alternative to open ILND. Videoendoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) may decrease complications compared to open ILND and provide equivalent short-term oncological outcomes.

As yet, there have been no randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) comparing these procedures.

VELRAD aims to assess the feasibility of performing a RCT comparing VEIL and open ILND. This will be measured by recruitment rate, the acceptability of the trial design and intervention to clinical stage and patients. Investigators will also collect qualitative data on why patients did or did not agree to be randomised

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •People requiring inguinal lymphadenectomy i.e.
  • •Patients with squamous cell carcinoma or mucosal melanoma of the penis > T1bG2 or patients with male genital cancer requiring inguinal lymphadenectomy
  • •Patients unsuitable for dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) with impalpable nodes: previous penectomy or non-visualisation at previous DSNB
  • •Previous DSNB with metastatic inguinal nodes on histology or FNA positive nodes on cytology who require a completion radical inguinal lymphadenectomy
  • •Small volume palpable inguinal lymph nodes (< 2 cm on CT) not fixed to skin
  • •Age > 18 years

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Unfit for surgery
  • •People unlikely to benefit from lymphadenectomy because of advanced cancer
  • •Those with palpable inguinal lymph nodes fixed to skin or adjacent structures
  • •Does not want to participate in the trial or unable to provide informed consent

Arms & Interventions

Videoendoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy

Active Comparator

Removal of inguinal nodes using Videoendoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy

Intervention: Videoendoscopic radical inguinal lymphadenectomy or open radical inguinal lymphadenectomy (Procedure)

Open Inguinal Lymphadenectomy

Other

Removal of inguinal nodes using Open radical inguinal lymphadenectomy

Intervention: Videoendoscopic radical inguinal lymphadenectomy or open radical inguinal lymphadenectomy (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Ability to recruit patients

Time Frame: 18 months

Ability to recruit patients at the selected sites (recruitment rate)

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials