Study of Acid Reflux in Asthma
- Conditions
- AsthmaLung Diseases, ObstructiveLung Diseases
- Interventions
- Drug: Placebo proton pump inhibitorDrug: Esomeprazole
- Registration Number
- NCT00069823
- Lead Sponsor
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if subjects with symptomatic asthma who are assigned to treatment with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) drug such as Nexium have fewer asthma attacks than similar subjects assigned to placebo treatment.
- Detailed Description
BACKGROUND:
Gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) is frequent in asthmatics with poor asthma control, often occurs without symptoms, and can induce bronchoconstriction. Poorly controlled asthmatics are often treated for GERD with drugs that suppress gastric acid, but this treatment is expensive and the benefit of such treatment is not established. Proton pump inhibitors are a relatively new class of medications that provide highly effective treatment for GERD and associated problems. This success has led many doctors to begin PPI treatment in their asthma patients in an attempt to achieve better asthma control.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
The randomized, placebo-controlled trial will enroll 400 asthmatics, ages 18 or older, who have poor asthma control on inhaled steroids, defined on the basis of excessive bronchodilator use, nocturnal awakenings, or frequent exacerbations. Participants will be randomly assigned to treatment with either a proton pump inhibitor, esomeprazole (Nexium) 40 mg twice a day, or matching placebo. The presence, severity, and temporal relationship of GERD to asthma symptoms will be documented with 24 hour ambulatory esophageal potential Hydrogen (pH) probe monitoring, but participants will be enrolled irrespective of the severity of GERD. The primary outcome measure is the proportion of participants who have exacerbations of asthma within a 6-month period defined by asthma diaries and interviews. Secondary outcome measures include asthma symptom and control scores, asthma-specific and generic health-related quality of life, GERD symptoms, health care use, pulmonary function, and airways reactivity. Pre-specified subgroup analyses will be conducted to determine if there are clinical or demographic characteristics that predict benefit from treatment of GERD in asthma.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 403
- The general goal of patient selection is to enroll patients for whom asthma physicians might prescribe GERD treatment, but where there is uncertainty whether it might be effective.
- Age 18 or older
- Physician diagnosed asthma
- If amount of air expired in the first second during a forced expiratory maneuver (FEV1) is greater than or equal to 70% predicted normal pre-bronchodilator: demonstrate methacholine 20% from post-diluent baseline (PC20). PC20 less than 16 mg/ml during Visit 1
- If FEV1 less than 70% and greater than or equal to 50% predicted normal pre-bronchodilator: demonstrate 12% reversibility during Visit 1 or within past 12 months
- Currently on stable dose of daily inhaled steroids for asthma control, i.e., inhaled corticosteroid equivalent to 400 ug/day of fluticasone44 or greater for 8 weeks or longer
- Poor asthma control: Either of the following; a score of 1.5 or greater on the Juniper Asthma Control Questionnaire; two or more episodes of asthma symptoms in the past 12 months with each episode requiring at least one of the following: an emergency department visit, unscheduled physician visit, prednisone course, hospitalization
- Non-smoker for 6 months or longer
- Less than 10 pack/year smoking history
- Surgery: Previous anti-reflux or peptic ulcer surgery
- Pulmonary function: FEV1 less than 50% predicted normal pre-bronchodilator
- GERD Symptoms: Severe reflux constituting a clinical indication for treatment with a PPI or H2 blocker, typically two or more episodes per week of heartburn requiring antacids
- Other major chronic illnesses; conditions which in the judgment of the Study Physician would interfere with participation in the study, e.g., non-skin cancer, endocrine disease, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, stroke, severe hypertension, Type 1 insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, renal failure, liver disorders, immunodeficiency states, major neuropsychiatric disorder
- Medication use: Anti-reflux medication (proton pump inhibitors or H2 blockers) within 1 month Theophylline, azoles, iron, anti-coagulants, insulin (for Type I diabetes), digitalis, any investigative drugs within 1 month
- Drug allergy: Previous adverse effects from proton pump inhibitors or methacholine challenge
- Females of childbearing potential: Pregnant or lactating, unwilling to practice an adequate birth control method (abstinence, combination barrier and spermicide, or hormonal)
- Inability or unwillingness to provide consent
- Inability to perform baseline measurements
- Completion of less than 10 of the last 14 days of screening period diary entry
- Inability to be contacted by telephone
- Intention to move out of the area within 6 months
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Placebo for esomeprazoe Placebo proton pump inhibitor Placebo Esomeprazole Esomeprazole Proton pump inhibitor of gastric acid
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Episodes of Poor Asthma Control (EPAC) From Diary Cards, According to Definition That Did Not Include Use of Beta-agonists as a Criterion Baseline to 24 Weeks Episodes of poor asthma control was defined as any one of the following: 2 consecutive days with a drop in peak flow \>=30% of baseline; urgent care for asthma; or new use of oral corticosteroids for asthma
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pulmonary Function: Change in Prebronchodilator FEV1 Baseline to 24 Weeks Mean change in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 - forced expiratory volume in 1 second; a measure of pulmonary function. The treatment effect is the difference in the mean change in between the groups.
Exacerbation Components: >=30% Drop in Peak Expiratory Flow on 2 Consecutive Days Baseline to 24 Weeks Exacerbation Components: Urgent Care Visit Measured at Month 6 Exacerbation Components: New Use of Oral Corticosteroids Baseline to 24 Weeks Asthma Episodes, According to Definition That Included Increased Use of Beta-agonists Baseline to 24 Weeks Use of Rescue Medications Baseline to 24 Weeks Increase in the use of rescue meds by 4 or more uses on a particular day above the average uses during the run-in period.
Night Awakening Baseline to 24 Weeks Rate of awakening at night because of asthma symptoms
Pulmonary Function: Change in Prebronchodilator Forced Vital Capacity Baseline to 24 Weeks Pulmonary function measured by mean change in Prebronchodilator forced vital capacity from baseline to 24 weeks
Pulmonary Function: Change in Peak Flow Rate Baseline to 24 Weeks Mean change from baseline to 24 weeks in the peak flow rate - how forceful patient can blow out air
Pulmonary Function: Change in PC20 Baseline to 24 Weeks Mean Change in the dose of methacholine that results in a 20% drop in FEV1
Change in Juniper Asthma Control Score(JACQ) Baseline to 24 Weeks Mean change. Scores on the JACQ range from 0 to 6, with lower scores indicating better asthma control and 0.5 as the minimal clinically important difference.
Change in Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Baseline to 24 Weeks Mean change. Scores on the ASUI range from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating less severe asthma.
Change in the Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ) Baseline to 24 Weeks Mean change. Scores on the Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (mini-AQLQ)range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating better quality of life and 0.5 as the minimal clinically important difference.
Change in Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 Score Quality of Life Score: Physical Component Baseline to 24 Weeks Mean change. Scores on the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 range from 1 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life and 5 as the minimal clinically important difference.
Change in Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 Quality of Life Score: Mental Component Baseline to 24 Weeks Mean change. Scores on the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 range from 1 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life and 5 as the minimal clinically important difference.
Change in Gastric Symptoms: Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptom Assessment Scale Score Baseline to 24 Weeks Mean change. The Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptom Assessment Scale score ranges from 0 to 3, with lower numbers indicating less distress.
Change in Number of Gastric Symptoms: No. of Symptoms Baseline to 24 Weeks Mean change
Trial Locations
- Locations (20)
Ohio State University
🇺🇸Columbus, Ohio, United States
Northern New England Consortium
🇺🇸Colchester, Vermont, United States
University of Miami
🇺🇸Miami, Florida, United States
Baylor College of Medicine
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States
Nemours Childrens Clinic
🇺🇸Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States
Indiana University ACRC
🇺🇸Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
NYU School of Medicine
🇺🇸New York, New York, United States
University of Alabama at Birmingham
🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Washington University School of Medicine
🇺🇸St. Louis, Missouri, United States
Thomas Jefferson Hospital Pulmonary Lab
🇺🇸Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
North Shore-LIJ Medical Center
🇺🇸New Hyde Park, New York, United States
University of California, San Diego
🇺🇸San Diego, California, United States
University of Minnesota
🇺🇸Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Duke University
🇺🇸Durham, North Carolina, United States
New York Medical College
🇺🇸Valhalla, New York, United States
National Jewish Medical and Research Center
🇺🇸Denver, Colorado, United States
LSUHSC Pulmonary Critical Care
🇺🇸New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Univ of MO Kansas City School of Medicine
🇺🇸Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Emory University
🇺🇸Atlanta, Georgia, United States