MedPath

The Effect of Video and Traditional Laryngoscopy on Hemodynamic Response in Hypertensive and Normotensive Patients

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Hypertension
Intubation
Anesthesia
Interventions
Device: C-Mac Videolaryngoscope
Device: Macintosh laryngoscopy
Registration Number
NCT03376828
Lead Sponsor
Aydin Adnan Menderes University
Brief Summary

During endotracheal intubation, it is known that la laryngoscopy has significant effects, such as tachycardia and blood pressure increase, which may be harmful, especially in those with cardiovascular disease. Different studies comparing laryngeal stimulation and there resulting hemodynamic response made with various intubation devices are available in the literature. The investigators planned to work with the hypothesis that endotracheal intubation with videolaryngoscopy would have less hemodynamic response traditional (Macintosh) laryngoscopy and the use of videolaryngoscopy would result in wider vision with less laryngeal stimulation.

Detailed Description

In this study, in a study on endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia, a routine preparation of endotracheal intubation using video laryngoscopy or Macintosh laryngoscopy in adult hypertensive and normotensive patients between 18-75 years old, form will be written and recorded.

Patient age, weight, height, sex, operation, co-morbid conditions and vital findings, measurements used in airway evaluation, initial trial success, laryngoscope using number of procedures, intubation tube number will be recorded.

Statistical analysis was performed using statistical program to compare the hemodynamic response of hypertensive and normotensive patients using videolaryngoscope or Macintosh laryngoscope

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
200
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age: 18-75 years.
  • Underwent surgery under general anesthesia.
Exclusion Criteria
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) IV, V patients
  • Preoperative systolic blood pressure 180 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure a pressure above 110 mmHg.
  • Ejection fraction is less than 40%.
  • Difficult intubation history
  • Mallampati 3,4

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Hypertensive VL groupC-Mac VideolaryngoscopeHypertensive VL group: Patients participating in the study were randomly assigned hypertensive (preoperative systolic blood pressure \<180 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure \<100 mmHg) C-Mac Videolaryngoscope using intubated
Non-hypertensive T groupMacintosh laryngoscopyNon-hypertensive T group: (Preoperative systolic blood pressure \< 140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure \< 100 mmHg) Macintosh laryngoscopy using intubated
Non-hypertensive VL groupC-Mac VideolaryngoscopeNon-hypertensive VL group: Preoperative systolic blood pressure \< 140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure \< 100 mmHg C-Mac Videolaryngoscope using intubated
Hypertensive T groupMacintosh laryngoscopyHypertensive T group: Patients participating in the study were randomly assigned hypertensive (preoperative systolic blood pressure \<180 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure \<100 mmHg) Macintosh laryngoscopy using intubated
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Hemodynamic response0-10 minute

Change from baseline noninvasive blood pressure and heart rate

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
intubation time0-120 seconds

The time elapsed between the passage of the laryngoscopy through the teeth to teeth

Glottic view gradeDuring intubation

Using the Cormack Lehane score

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Adnan Menderes University Training and Research Hospital

🇹🇷

Aydın, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath