Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2024/07/071669
CTRI/2024/07/071669
Not yet recruiting
Phase 2/3

Efficacy of Baska Mask versus Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway in elective surgeries under general anesthesia - a Randomized Controlled Trial

Dr. R. Ajisha Rachel1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentStarted: August 10, 2024Last updated:

Overview

Phase
Phase 2/3
Status
Not yet recruiting
Sponsor
Dr. R. Ajisha Rachel
Enrollment
60
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
To measure time taken for insertion, ease of insertion and number of attempts for insertion between the Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway and the Baska Mask

Overview

Brief Summary

The supraglottic airway devices (SAD) have drastically changed the face of airway management in patients undergoing anesthesia and have become a key component of modern airway management, especially in surgeries of short durations.

The Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) is a reusable second generation SAD with an additional inflatable dorsal cuff, integrated bite block, and a gastric drain tube, while the Baska Mask (BM), a third generation SAD, possesses newer modified features such as a sump with two drains and a bite block throughout the entire length of the airway tube, which would lead to better clinical performance than the PLMA.

This study aims to compare the advantages and efficacy of Baska Mask (BM) over Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) ) in adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia with controlled ventilation.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Masking
Participant Blinded

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18.00 Year(s) to 60.00 Year(s) (—)
Sex
All

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients of either gender, from 18 to 60 years of age, belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classes I, II and III.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients refusal, BMI more than or equal to 30 kg per metre square, Restricted mouth opening, Surgeries lasting more than 2 hours, Burns and swelling in neck, High aspiration risk with poor pulmonary compliance.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

To measure time taken for insertion, ease of insertion and number of attempts for insertion between the Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway and the Baska Mask

Time Frame: At start of insertion of both devices

Secondary Outcomes

  • To measure oropharyngeal seal pressure (OSP) logged at two different times and post- insertion(complications between Baska Mask and Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway)

Investigators

Sponsor
Dr. R. Ajisha Rachel
Sponsor Class
Other [self]
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Dr R Ajisha Rachel

Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials